Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes the inverse correlation between the size of pasture areas and livestock productivity in Brazil. It argues that low productivity is driven by land-use inefficiencies and economic incentives, such as low land costs relative to capital. The authors suggest that combating illegal deforestation, reducing agricultural modernization bottlenecks, and improving credit access can incentivize the transition to more intensive livestock production or high-productivity agriculture, thereby reducing pressure on the Amazon and Cerrado biomes.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • There is a significant negative correlation between livestock productivity and the proportion of a farm dedicated to pasture; for a typical municipality, halving the area used for pasture leads to a 20% increase in livestock revenue per hectare and an increase of 0.25 head of cattle per hectare.
  • The cost of land is a primary driver of the inverse relationship between pasture size and productivity; higher land prices are associated with smaller pasture areas and higher productivity, explaining at least one-third of this negative correlation.
  • Improving land-use management alone could double livestock productivity, and combining these improvements with more efficient cattle management (breeding and feeding) could increase productivity by 2.5 times.
  • Livestock productivity growth in Brazil slowed significantly, increasing by only 6.5% between 2006 and 2017, compared to a 27.8% increase between 1995 and 2006, with a particularly concerning decline in the number of cattle per hectare in the Amazon over the last eleven years.
  • Combating illegal deforestation and land grabbing (grilagem) creates incentives for ranchers to improve productivity or migrate to agriculture by removing the artificial lowering of land prices that encourages extensive, low-productivity ranching.
  • Reducing bottlenecks to agricultural modernization (such as transport costs and poor storage) and improving access to credit can drive the conversion of unproductive pastures into high-productivity cropland or more capital-intensive livestock systems.

Cite the original document

APA
ASSUNÇÃO, J., & BRAGANÇA, A. (2019). PECUÁRIA MAIS PRODUTIVA PARA O BRASIL. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WhitePaper_Pecuaria_PT_112019_final-2.pdf
Chicago
ASSUNÇÃO, JULIANO, and ARTHUR BRAGANÇA. PECUÁRIA MAIS PRODUTIVA PARA O BRASIL. Climate Policy Initiative, 2019. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WhitePaper_Pecuaria_PT_112019_final-2.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=ASSUNÇÃO |first1=JULIANO |last2=BRAGANÇA |first2=ARTHUR |title=PECUÁRIA MAIS PRODUTIVA PARA O BRASIL |publisher=Climate Policy Initiative |date=November 2019 |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WhitePaper_Pecuaria_PT_112019_final-2.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{assuno2019pecuria, author = {ASSUNÇÃO, JULIANO and BRAGANÇA, ARTHUR}, title = {{PECUÁRIA MAIS PRODUTIVA PARA O BRASIL}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, year = {2019}, month = nov, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WhitePaper_Pecuaria_PT_112019_final-2.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated