Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

Public adaptation finance grew by at least 12% to $25 billion between 2012 and 2013, though it remains insufficient for a warming trajectory exceeding 2 °C. Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) were the primary source of funding, with low-cost loans accounting for 52% ($12.9 billion) of total finance and grants representing 16% ($3.9 billion). Approximately 90% of captured adaptation finance ($22 billion) was invested in non-OECD developing countries, with the East Asia and Pacific region being the primary destination for total and DFI financing, while Sub-Saharan Africa received the most funding from governments and Climate Funds.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Public adaptation finance increased by at least 12% to reach $25 billion from 2012 to 2013, but this amount is insufficient given a warming trajectory likely to exceed 2 °C.
  • Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) were the leading source of finance, with national DFIs providing about half of total DFI flows. Low-cost loans were the primary instrument, comprising 52% ($12.9 billion) of the total, while grants made up 16% ($3.9 billion) and were the main tool for governments' aid and Climate Funds.
  • Sectoral priorities varied by investor: DFIs focused on water supply and management (66% of commitments), governments prioritized agriculture and forestry (33%), and Climate Funds targeted multi-sectorial activities (32%).
  • Of the $22 billion in captured adaptation finance invested in developing (non-OECD) countries (representing 90% of the total), $8 billion originated from developed countries. The East Asia and Pacific region was the top recipient of total and DFI finance, whereas Sub-Saharan Africa received the most from governments (31%) and Climate Funds (51%).

Cite the original document

APA
Climate Policy Initiative (n.d.). A CLOSER LOOK AT PUBLIC ADAPTATION FINANCE. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-Closer-Look-at-Public-Adaptation-Finance.pdf
Chicago
Climate Policy Initiative. A CLOSER LOOK AT PUBLIC ADAPTATION FINANCE. n.d. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-Closer-Look-at-Public-Adaptation-Finance.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Climate Policy Initiative |title=A CLOSER LOOK AT PUBLIC ADAPTATION FINANCE |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-Closer-Look-at-Public-Adaptation-Finance.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{climatepolicyinitiativendcloser, author = {{Climate Policy Initiative}}, title = {{A CLOSER LOOK AT PUBLIC ADAPTATION FINANCE}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-Closer-Look-at-Public-Adaptation-Finance.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated