全球绿色分类标准制定、统一及实施进展研究报告

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report examines the global trend of establishing green taxonomies to define sustainable economic activities and reduce 'greenwashing'. It details three primary methodology types: whitelist-based, technical screening criteria-based, and principle-based. A significant portion of the document compares the EU's six-objective framework with China's three-objective system, highlighting the 'Common Ground Taxonomy' as a tool to improve interoperability between the two markets. The report concludes that while taxonomies are essential for product development and risk management, challenges remain regarding data quality and the need to incorporate transition guidelines for high-emission industries.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Green taxonomies are generally developed using one or a combination of three methods: whitelist-based (listing specific qualified projects, used by China, Mongolia, and Russia), technical screening criteria-based (setting thresholds for substantial contribution and 'do no significant harm', used by the EU, South Africa, and South Korea), and principle-based (establishing core guiding principles, used by Malaysia and Japan).
  • To meet Paris Agreement goals, existing taxonomies must evolve to include transition guidelines for high-emission industries, prioritizing the decarbonization of high-carbon sectors by 2030.

Cite the original document

APA
徐小云, 谢文泓, & 邓曼姝 (2022). 全球绿色分类标准制定、统一及实施进展研究报告. Climate Bonds Initiative. https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%BB%BF%E8%89%B2%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E5%88%B6%E5%AE%9A%E3%80%81%E7%BB%9F%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%8A%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf
Chicago
徐小云, 谢文泓, and 邓曼姝. 全球绿色分类标准制定、统一及实施进展研究报告. Climate Bonds Initiative, 2022. https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%BB%BF%E8%89%B2%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E5%88%B6%E5%AE%9A%E3%80%81%E7%BB%9F%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%8A%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=徐小云 |last2=谢文泓 |last3=邓曼姝 |title=全球绿色分类标准制定、统一及实施进展研究报告 |publisher=Climate Bonds Initiative |date=February 2022 |url=https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%BB%BF%E8%89%B2%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E5%88%B6%E5%AE%9A%E3%80%81%E7%BB%9F%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%8A%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{2022, author = {徐小云 and 谢文泓 and 邓曼姝}, title = {{全球绿色分类标准制定、统一及实施进展研究报告}}, institution = {Climate Bonds Initiative}, year = {2022}, month = feb, url = {https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%BB%BF%E8%89%B2%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E5%88%B6%E5%AE%9A%E3%80%81%E7%BB%9F%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%8A%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated