Attention Shifts to COP25 to Deliver on Paris and Avert Climate Catastrophe

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) describes the progress at the SB50 talks in Bonn as "glacial," noting that while a non-consensus text for Article 6 was established for COP25, critical language on human rights remains in brackets. CIEL emphasizes that Article 6 mechanisms—which include carbon credit markets and sustainable development mechanisms—must incorporate independent grievance bodies and social safeguards to avoid the failures of the Clean Development Mechanism. The statement also highlights the importance of the Escazú Agreement for environmental democracy in Latin America and condemns countries that questioned the IPCC's Special Report on 1.5°C during the negotiations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Negotiations at SB50 resulted in minimal progress, with parties agreeing to use a single non-consensus text as the basis for further discussions on Article 6 at COP25 in Chile.
  • CIEL argues that Article 6 mechanisms must include strong human rights-based social and environmental safeguards and an independent grievance body to prevent the displacement of indigenous peoples and biodiversity loss seen under the Clean Development Mechanism.
  • Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is intended to facilitate international cooperation to meet Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) through three approaches: internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (carbon credit trading), a “Sustainable Development Mechanism” for financing mitigation projects, and non-market cooperative approaches.
  • Civil society advocates emphasized the Escazú Agreement as a critical regional instrument for environmental democracy, public participation, and the protection of environmental human rights defenders in Latin America.

Cite the original document

APA
Center for International Environmental Law (2019). Attention Shifts to COP25 to Deliver on Paris and Avert Climate Catastrophe. https://www.ciel.org/news/bonn-climate-talks-make-little-progress-though-human-rights-remain-in-draft-text/
Chicago
Center for International Environmental Law. Attention Shifts to COP25 to Deliver on Paris and Avert Climate Catastrophe. 2019. https://www.ciel.org/news/bonn-climate-talks-make-little-progress-though-human-rights-remain-in-draft-text/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=Attention Shifts to COP25 to Deliver on Paris and Avert Climate Catastrophe |date=28 June 2019 |url=https://www.ciel.org/news/bonn-climate-talks-make-little-progress-though-human-rights-remain-in-draft-text/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2019attention, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{Attention Shifts to COP25 to Deliver on Paris and Avert Climate Catastrophe}}, publisher = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2019}, month = jun, url = {https://www.ciel.org/news/bonn-climate-talks-make-little-progress-though-human-rights-remain-in-draft-text/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated