Integrating Human Rights in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
Summary
The toolkit argues that rights-based approaches lead to more effective and legitimate climate outcomes. It outlines a three-step process for integrating rights into NDCs: inclusive planning, transparent communication of how rights informed that planning, and reflecting human rights obligations in implementation and monitoring. The document provides specific recommendations across seven thematic areas: ambition, participatory planning, general human rights integration, gender mainstreaming, Indigenous Peoples' rights, land tenure, and just transition. It emphasizes that states must align their climate ambition with the 1.5°C target to fulfill human rights obligations and should account for all emissions under their jurisdiction, including extraterritorial ones. The toolkit includes guiding questions and illustrative examples from the NDCs of Canada, Mexico, Vanuatu, Nepal, Costa Rica, Bolivia, and Chile to demonstrate best practices in human rights-based climate action.
Key insights
- The 1.5°C temperature target is more compatible with human rights obligations than the 2°C target, as every incremental increase in temperature magnifies human rights impacts.
- While the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement primarily track territorial emissions, human rights law requires states to be accountable for all emissions under their jurisdiction or control, including those occurring extraterritorially from the export of fossil fuels or business conduct abroad.
- Effective public participation in the NDC process must be inclusive, start at the earliest stages of planning, and include specific measures to ensure the involvement of marginalized groups, such as Indigenous Peoples, women, and persons with disabilities.
- States should mainstream gender equality across all NDC policy areas, utilizing gender-disaggregated data, gender budgeting, and recognizing women and gender-diverse persons as agents of change rather than just vulnerable groups.
- The planning and implementation of NDCs must respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples, specifically requiring their free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) for projects affecting their lands, territories, and traditional knowledge.
- Securing community land rights and Indigenous forestlands tenure is identified as a cost-effective mitigation policy that helps curb emissions from deforestation and ecosystem degradation.
- A just transition in the context of NDCs requires the protection of labor rights, the use of tripartite social dialogue involving governments, employers, and workers, and the provision of retraining and social protection for workers in declining industries.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Center for International Environmental Law (2022). Integrating Human Rights in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NDC-Toolkit-Feb-2025-EN.pdf
- Chicago
- Center for International Environmental Law. Integrating Human Rights in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). 2022. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NDC-Toolkit-Feb-2025-EN.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=Integrating Human Rights in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) |date=November 2022 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NDC-Toolkit-Feb-2025-EN.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2022integrating, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{Integrating Human Rights in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2022}, month = nov, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NDC-Toolkit-Feb-2025-EN.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated