Browse all documents

Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Marrakech Accords establish a robust compliance system for the Kyoto Protocol, featuring a two-branch compliance committee (facilitative and enforcement) with membership based on equitable geographical representation and double majority voting. Annex I Parties failing to meet emissions targets face specific penalties, including deductions from future assigned amounts and loss of emissions trading privileges. While the system provides for public participation and appeals, the legal nature of its 'binding' consequences remains a point of contention among Parties, specifically the Umbrella Group.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Marrakech Accords establish a compliance committee divided into two branches: a facilitative branch and an enforcement branch. The facilitative branch assists all Parties (Annex I and non-Annex I) and acts as an "early warning system" for Annex I Parties struggling with emissions targets. The enforcement branch operates as a judicial-like forum to determine if Annex I Parties have met emissions targets, complied with monitoring and reporting, and met eligibility tests for mechanisms.
  • The compliance committee's membership is based on equitable geographical representation, and decisions are made via double majority voting. This means a decision requires approval from majorities of both the Annex I and non-Annex I member blocs.
  • Annex I Parties that fail to meet their emissions targets face three specific consequences: a deduction of 1.3 tonnes from their assigned amount for the next commitment period for every tonne exceeded, the requirement to prepare a detailed compliance plan for the enforcement branch to review, and a prohibition on selling emissions allocations via Article 17 emissions trading.
  • The system allows for public participation, enabling NGOs to submit technical and factual information. While most information and hearings are open to the public, the enforcement branch has the discretion to grant requests from a Party to withhold submitted information or close a hearing.
  • Parties can appeal enforcement branch decisions to the COP/MOP, but only on the grounds of denied due process. Such decisions remain in effect pending the appeal and require a 3/4 majority vote of the COP/MOP to be overturned.
  • There is an ongoing dispute regarding whether non-compliance consequences are "legally binding" under Article 18 of the Kyoto Protocol. While the Marrakech Accords establish the procedures and consequences, the legal form of these mechanisms remains the "prerogative" of the COP/MOP to decide.
  • The final text includes new procedures for reinstating a Party's eligibility to participate in flexibility mechanisms after suspension. These procedures create a presumption of reinstatement upon request, though the enforcement branch may deny it if the Party has not complied or cannot comply with future targets.

Cite the original document

APA
Wiser, G. (2001). Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol. Center for International Environmental Law. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf
Chicago
Wiser, Glenn. Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol. Center for International Environmental Law, 2001. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Wiser |first1=Glenn |title=Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol |publisher=Center for International Environmental Law |date=7 December 2001 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wiser2001report, author = {Wiser, Glenn}, title = {{Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2001}, month = dec, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated