Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report details the compliance framework of the Marrakech Accords, which includes a two-branch compliance committee (facilitative and enforcement) and specific penalties for Annex I Parties that exceed emissions targets. It highlights the tension between the European Union, G-77, and China, who sought a strong regime, and the Umbrella Group (Japan, Canada, Russia, and Australia), who pushed for concessions. A key unresolved issue is whether non-compliance consequences are 'legally binding' under Article 18 of the Kyoto Protocol, though the author argues the established procedures represent a robust achievement for multilateral environmental agreements.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The compliance system consists of a compliance committee divided into two branches: a facilitative branch that assists all Parties and acts as an "early warning system" for Annex I Parties, and an enforcement branch that functions as a "judicial-like forum" to determine if Annex I Parties met targets, reporting requirements, and eligibility tests.
  • Membership of the compliance committee is based on equitable geographical representation, and decisions are made via double majority voting, requiring approval from both Annex I and non-Annex I member blocs.
  • Annex I Parties that exceed their emissions targets face three specific consequences: a deduction of 1.3 tonnes from their subsequent commitment period's assigned amount for every tonne of excess emissions, the requirement to prepare a detailed compliance plan for review by the enforcement branch, and a prohibition on selling emissions allocations via Article 17 emissions trading.
  • The report identifies a continuing legal ambiguity regarding whether non-compliance consequences are "legally binding" under Article 18 of the Kyoto Protocol, noting that the Umbrella Group successfully added language stating it is the "prerogative" of the COP/MOP to decide the legal form of compliance procedures.

Cite the original document

APA
Wiser, G. (2001). Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol. Center for International Environmental Law. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf
Chicago
Wiser, Glenn. Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol. Center for International Environmental Law, 2001. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Wiser |first1=Glenn |title=Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol |publisher=Center for International Environmental Law |date=7 December 2001 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wiser2001report, author = {Wiser, Glenn}, title = {{Report on the Compliance Section of the Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2001}, month = dec, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Marrakech_Accords_Dec01.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated