EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADE & POSITIVE MEASURES IN MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

The report concludes that the Montreal Protocol's integrated system of trade restrictions and positive incentives has been effective in achieving near-universal ratification and significantly reducing global emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS). Trade measures, such as bans on imports and exports of ODS and products containing them, created economic pressures that encouraged non-parties to join or comply to maintain market access. Simultaneously, positive measures—including a ten-year grace period for Article 5 parties, a financial mechanism (the Multilateral Fund), and technology transfer—lowered the economic and political barriers for developing countries. The report highlights a strong correlation between the implementation of these measures and spikes in ratification rates, particularly among export-dependent Asian economies and major ODS producers. While some Article 5 parties saw increased consumption during their grace periods, the overall global use of Annex A and B substances fell by 80% from baseline levels by 1995.

• The Montreal Protocol's trade and positive measures have been effective in increasing ratification and compliance, contributing to the primary goal of reducing global emissions of ozone-depleting substances.
• By 1995, global consumption of Annex A and Annex B substances had been reduced by 80% compared to baseline levels.
• The ban on imports of controlled substances (CS) from non-parties likely influenced the ratification decisions of producing states by restricting their access to markets in party states.
• The export ban on controlled substances created a strong incentive for importing nations to ratify the Protocol to ensure continued access to CS supplies.
• The ban on imports of products containing controlled substances (PCCS) was particularly effective in prompting ratification among export-dependent Asian economies, such as South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore, to protect their electronics and refrigeration exports.
• Positive measures, specifically the ten-year grace period for Article 5 parties, allowed developing countries to join the Protocol without immediate economic disruption or sacrificing short-term development.
• The Financial Mechanism, including the Multilateral Fund, was instrumental in securing the ratification of major developing nations like India and China, who made their participation contingent on funding.
• The non-compliance procedure's focus on 'self-reporting' and cooperative assistance rather than punitive measures has encouraged parties to admit and address compliance problems.
• Trade measures served as a deterrent against 'leakage,' preventing industries in party states from relocating production facilities to non-party states to avoid control measures.

APA

Goldberg, D. L., Van Dyke, B., Bullen, S., Lacosta, N., Muffett, C., & Bartenhagen, E. (n.d.). EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADE & POSITIVE MEASURES IN MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL. Center for International Environmental Law. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EffectivenessofTradeandPosMeasures.pdf

Chicago

Goldberg, Donald L., Brennan Van Dyke, Sally Bullen, Nuno Lacosta, Carroll Muffett, and Eric Bartenhagen. EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADE & POSITIVE MEASURES IN MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL. Center for International Environmental Law, n.d. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EffectivenessofTradeandPosMeasures.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Goldberg |first1=Donald L. |last2=Van Dyke |first2=Brennan |last3=Bullen |first3=Sally |last4=Lacosta |first4=Nuno |last5=Muffett |first5=Carroll |last6=Bartenhagen |first6=Eric |title=EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADE & POSITIVE MEASURES IN MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL |publisher=Center for International Environmental Law |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EffectivenessofTradeandPosMeasures.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{goldbergndeffectiveness, author = {Goldberg, Donald L. and Van Dyke, Brennan and Bullen, Sally and Lacosta, Nuno and Muffett, Carroll and Bartenhagen, Eric}, title = {{EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADE \& POSITIVE MEASURES IN MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EffectivenessofTradeandPosMeasures.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }