Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report estimates that five of the largest meat companies and ten of the largest dairy corporations emit approximately 12.8 million tonnes of methane, representing 3.4% of global anthropogenic methane emissions and 11.1% of global livestock methane. Total greenhouse gas emissions for these companies reach 734 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, exceeding Germany's national emissions. The authors highlight a lack of corporate transparency, noting that 60% of the analyzed companies do not report total emissions or Scope 3 emissions, and none reported supply chain methane. The report calls for binding reduction targets, mandatory reporting, and a systemic shift toward agroecology to meet the 1.5°C global warming limit.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The combined methane emissions of the fifteen analyzed meat and dairy companies total approximately 12.8 million tonnes, which is more than 80% of the European Union's total methane footprint.
  • These fifteen companies account for roughly 3.4% of all global anthropogenic methane emissions and 11.1% of the methane produced by livestock worldwide.
  • The total greenhouse gas emissions of these companies are approximately 734 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, a figure that exceeds the emissions of Germany; if treated as a single country, they would be the tenth largest GHG-emitting jurisdiction globally.
  • Individual company emissions are comparable to national livestock sectors: Marfrig's emissions rival Australia's livestock sector, Tyson's are comparable to the Russian Federation, and Dairy Farmers of America's are comparable to the UK's livestock methane.
  • JBS is the largest emitter among the group, with methane emissions exceeding the combined livestock methane of France, Germany, Canada, and New Zealand, and equaling 55% of the methane produced by livestock in the US.
  • Corporate reporting is insufficient: 60% of the companies (9 out of 15) do not report their emissions or their Scope 3 supply chain emissions, and no company reported methane emissions from its supply chain.
  • Despite the Global Methane Pledge to reduce global emissions by 30% by 2030, five of the countries where these companies are headquartered have increased livestock methane emissions over the last decade: the US (over 5%), Brazil (over 6%), China (over 17%), New Zealand (over 3%), and the Netherlands (nearly 2%).

Cite the original document

APA
Changing Markets Foundation (2022). Emisiones Imposibles: Edición Metano. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Emissions-Impossible_Methane-Edition_ExecSum_ESP_Final.pdf
Chicago
Changing Markets Foundation. Emisiones Imposibles: Edición Metano. 2022. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Emissions-Impossible_Methane-Edition_ExecSum_ESP_Final.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Changing Markets Foundation |title=Emisiones Imposibles: Edición Metano |date=November 2022 |url=https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Emissions-Impossible_Methane-Edition_ExecSum_ESP_Final.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{changingmarketsfoundation2022emisiones, author = {{Changing Markets Foundation}}, title = {{Emisiones Imposibles: Edición Metano}}, institution = {Changing Markets Foundation}, year = {2022}, month = nov, url = {https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Emissions-Impossible_Methane-Edition_ExecSum_ESP_Final.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated