DRAFT AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT, 2004’S LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS WHICH HAVE OR MAY HAVE A SIGNFICANT DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING HEALTH, SOCIAL CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OR CULTURAL HERITAGE

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), acting for groundWork and the Vaal Environmental Justice Alliance (VEJA), submitted a statement to the Department of Environmental Affairs on 31 January 2012. The document objects to proposed amendments to the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004’s list of activities resulting in atmospheric emissions, arguing that the changes generally relax emission limits, extend compliance time-frames, and were developed through a non-transparent process that favored industry representatives over affected communities.

• The CER and its clients object to the Department of Environmental Affairs' consultation process, alleging that the Department provided industry representatives, specifically the Chemical and Allied Industries Association (CAIA), with draft lists and meetings prior to public publication, contradicting assurances that no substantive changes would be made.
• The proposed amendments are criticized for generally relaxing emission limits, which the CER claims allows industries to emit higher concentrations of harmful pollutants without provided explanation, particularly impacting areas already over-exposed to sulphur dioxide and particulate matter.
• In sub-category 2.1 (combustion installations), the proposed minimum limits for new plants are significantly higher than previous standards: particulate matter emissions would increase from 50mg/Nm3 to 70mg/Nm3 (a 40% increase), and oxides of nitrogen would increase from 250mg/Nm3 to 400mg/Nm3 (a 60% increase).
• The CER objects to the extension of compliance time-frames for the petroleum industry, noting that existing plants are now given five years to comply with existing plant standards and ten years for new plant standards, which the CER argues allows the industry to operate at the level of the most polluting installation.
• The document identifies several specific regulatory regressions, including the proposed deletion of particulate matter limits for char, charcoal and carbon black production (sub-category 3.4) and the deletion of oxides of nitrogen from drying and calcining (sub-category 4.1), leaving these emissions unregulated.
• The new sub-category 3.6 (synthetic gas production and clean-up), which the CER suggests was tailored for Sasol processes, contains hydrogen sulphide limits (4200mg/Nm3 for new plants and 8400mg/Nm3 for existing plants) that are vastly more lax than those in sub-category 3.2 (7mg/Nm3 and 10mg/Nm3 respectively).
• The CER objects to the proposal to defer the establishment of an internet-based National Atmospheric Emission Inventory by three years after the amendments take effect, as the original obligation was for it to be established by 1 April 2013.
• Concerns are raised regarding sub-category 2.4 (storage of petroleum products), specifically the tenfold increase in the output threshold for installations requiring vapour recovery units, which may leave an unknown number of units, including road tanker loading bays, unregulated.

APA

Centre for Environmental Rights (2012). DRAFT AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT, 2004’S LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS WHICH HAVE OR MAY HAVE A SIGNFICANT DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING HEALTH, SOCIAL CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OR CULTURAL HERITAGE. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Submissions-s21_31-January-2013_final.pdf?x21779

Chicago

Centre for Environmental Rights. DRAFT AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT, 2004’S LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS WHICH HAVE OR MAY HAVE A SIGNFICANT DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING HEALTH, SOCIAL CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OR CULTURAL HERITAGE. 2012. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Submissions-s21_31-January-2013_final.pdf?x21779.

Wikipedia

{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=DRAFT AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT, 2004’S LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS WHICH HAVE OR MAY HAVE A SIGNFICANT DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING HEALTH, SOCIAL CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OR CULTURAL HERITAGE |date=31 January 2012 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Submissions-s21_31-January-2013_final.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2012draft, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{DRAFT AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT, 2004’S LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH RESULT IN ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS WHICH HAVE OR MAY HAVE A SIGNFICANT DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING HEALTH, SOCIAL CONDITIONS, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OR CULTURAL HERITAGE}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2012}, month = jan, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Submissions-s21_31-January-2013_final.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }