Systematic exclusion of “extra” costs due to unreliability of electricity understates the actual extent of energy poverty in SSA

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The analysis demonstrates that households in Benin incur significant additional expenses for voltage stabilizers and generators to cope with power outages and fluctuations. When these 'extra' costs are included in energy poverty metrics, the percentage of energy-poor connected households rises from 51% to 72%. The report argues that current assessments are insufficient and calls for policymakers to incorporate these defensive costs into energy poverty measurements to design more targeted alleviation strategies.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Extra electricity costs, which include investments in voltage stabilizers and the operation of generators, make up 41% of the total electricity expenditures for households.
  • Including extra costs for defensive strategies significantly increases the measured rate of energy poverty among connected households in Benin, rising from 51% (based only on bills) to 72%.
  • Among connected households, there is a higher tendency to invest in voltage stabilizers (26%) than in power generators (7%) to protect against power quality issues rather than total unavailability.
  • The operating costs of power generators are the most significant component of extra electricity expenses, averaging FCFA 12,399 (USD 21) monthly, whereas voltage stabilizer investments average FCFA 516 (USD 1) monthly.
  • Household wealth, determined by asset ownership, is a more significant factor in preventing energy poverty than the employment status of the household head.
  • Energy poverty is more prevalent among households that experience planned blackouts and voltage fluctuations, those that use electricity for economic activities, and those that rely on generators.

Cite the original document

APA
Clean Air Task Force (n.d.). Systematic exclusion of “extra” costs due to unreliability of electricity understates the actual extent of energy poverty in SSA. https://cdn.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27142926/benin-household-energy-poverty_exsummary-english.pdf
Chicago
Clean Air Task Force. Systematic exclusion of “extra” costs due to unreliability of electricity understates the actual extent of energy poverty in SSA. n.d. https://cdn.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27142926/benin-household-energy-poverty_exsummary-english.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Clean Air Task Force |title=Systematic exclusion of “extra” costs due to unreliability of electricity understates the actual extent of energy poverty in SSA |url=https://cdn.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27142926/benin-household-energy-poverty_exsummary-english.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{cleanairtaskforcendsystematic, author = {{Clean Air Task Force}}, title = {{Systematic exclusion of “extra” costs due to unreliability of electricity understates the actual extent of energy poverty in SSA}}, institution = {Clean Air Task Force}, url = {https://cdn.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27142926/benin-household-energy-poverty_exsummary-english.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated