The gap between funding for carbon capture and storage projects and other emissions reduction options

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

Analysis by Carbon Limits for Clean Air Task Force indicates that the public funding per tonne of CO2 avoided for recent carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in Norway and the Netherlands is comparable to, or lower than, the average funding spent by EU schemes for onshore wind, offshore wind, and solar power since 2012.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • EU support schemes for renewable energy since 2012 spent an average of €121/t of CO2 avoided for onshore wind, €90/t for offshore wind, and €74/t for solar power.
  • Funding for the Longship project in Norway is €71/t of CO2 avoided, while the Porthos project in the Netherlands could receive up to €65/t, though the latter may be less as it only covers the gap with the EU carbon price.

Cite the original document

APA
Clean Air Task Force (2022). The gap between funding for carbon capture and storage projects and other emissions reduction options. https://www.catf.us/resource/the-gap-between-funding-carbon-capture-storage-projects-other-emissions-reduction-options/
Chicago
Clean Air Task Force. The gap between funding for carbon capture and storage projects and other emissions reduction options. 2022. https://www.catf.us/resource/the-gap-between-funding-carbon-capture-storage-projects-other-emissions-reduction-options/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Clean Air Task Force |title=The gap between funding for carbon capture and storage projects and other emissions reduction options |date=13 April 2022 |url=https://www.catf.us/resource/the-gap-between-funding-carbon-capture-storage-projects-other-emissions-reduction-options/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{cleanairtaskforce2022gap, author = {{Clean Air Task Force}}, title = {{The gap between funding for carbon capture and storage projects and other emissions reduction options}}, institution = {Clean Air Task Force}, year = {2022}, month = apr, url = {https://www.catf.us/resource/the-gap-between-funding-carbon-capture-storage-projects-other-emissions-reduction-options/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated