Search Climate Insights Directory

ClientEarth opposes a Brazilian bill that would restrict the legal recognition of Indigenous territories to lands occupied as of 1988. The organization argues this 'marco temporal' thesis violates human rights and threatens critical ecosystems like the Amazon and Cerrado, which are essential for global carbon sequestration.

The document argues that EU governments continue to provide billions in direct and indirect fossil fuel subsidies, which undermines climate neutrality goals and the 'polluter pays' principle. It calls for a single, comprehensive definition of fossil fuel subsidies to improve transparency and accountability, and demands a bold timeline for phasing out these subsidies to shift financial support toward sustainable sectors.

The report by ClientEarth and Global Witness advocates for a comprehensive EU-wide mandatory due diligence framework to replace failing voluntary corporate commitments. It highlights the EU's role in driving global deforestation and human rights abuses, particularly in the agricultural sector. The authors propose a system based on OECD Guidelines that covers all EU-based companies and investors, regardless of size, and includes strict transparency requirements, a robust penalty regime, and access to justice for affected parties outside the EU.

The Sustainable Seafood Coalition (SSC) is a UK-based association of seafood businesses that implements voluntary Codes of Conduct to harmonise environmental sourcing and labelling. Membership requires implementing these Codes within one year, providing benefits such as enhanced brand reputation and access to biannual industry meetings. Unlike product certification schemes, the SSC focuses on the business's overall sourcing strategy, with annual membership fees ranging from £150 to £3,000 based on company turnover.

ClientEarth calls on the European Parliament to veto the Taxonomy Complementary Delegated Act on Climate, arguing that the European Commission failed to conduct a dedicated Impact Assessment or ensure consistency with the European Climate Law. The organization asserts that fossil gas activities do not lack feasible low-carbon alternatives and that the act risks creating legal uncertainty and locking in carbon-intensive assets, thereby conflicting with the Paris Agreement and the EU's 2050 climate-neutrality goal.

The document argues that the EU Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Directives, particularly Directive 2008/50/EC, are essential tools for protecting public health and that failures to meet air quality targets are due to Member State implementation gaps rather than flaws in the legislation. The authors recommend maintaining binding limit values, updating standards to align with the latest World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines, and strengthening enforcement through infringement procedures. Key recommendations include the adoption of short-term action plans for particulate matter (PM) pollution events, the inclusion of indoor air pollution in future revisions, and stricter enforcement of Euro Standards for vehicles to address the 'Dieselgate' scandal.

The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) and ClientEarth challenge the UK government's (DECC) justification for a market-wide Capacity Mechanism, asserting that the analysis of generation adequacy is overly conservative and ignores the potential of demand response and interconnectors. They argue that a targeted strategic reserve would be a more cost-effective and less distortive alternative, especially given Ofgem's planned reforms to the Balancing Mechanism which would introduce stronger scarcity pricing signals.

The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) and ClientEarth contend that the UK government (DECC), National Grid, and Ofgem have underestimated available resources, leading to an exaggerated resource adequacy problem. They argue that treating interconnectors as generation would add at least 2.6 GW of capacity and that conventional generation availability is likely in the mid to low 90% range. Consequently, the authors claim the market-wide capacity mechanism is unnecessary, risks over-procuring national resources, undermines EU interconnectivity goals, and may not comply with state aid requirements of necessity and proportionality.

The factsheet evaluates the European Commission's proposal to revise the EU Fisheries Control System, highlighting improvements in electronic record-keeping and trip identification for EU-caught fish while criticizing loopholes in the traceability of imported seafood, such as the lack of mandatory IMO numbers and imprecise FAO fishing area codes.

The document outlines how forest carbon is monetised through compliance and voluntary markets, detailing Ghana's role as an early adopter of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. It describes Ghana's regulatory pathway for carbon projects, highlights key transactions like the Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Programme and the Ghana Shea Landscape Emission Reductions Project, and identifies risks such as double counting and bargaining power asymmetries. The briefing concludes with recommendations to codify regulations, standardise transaction documents, and target high-integrity market segments.

The factsheet highlights a significant lack of transparency regarding the implementation of the EU Fisheries Control Regulation (EC No 1224/2009). It notes that required reports from Member States and Commission audits are generally not public, hindering the ability of civil society and decision-makers to assess enforcement consistency. The document criticizes a Commission proposal for failing to address these gaps and recommends publishing audit reports, making national control programme reports public, and increasing the frequency of implementation reporting from every five years to every two years.

The document asserts that climate change and the net zero-carbon transition create material financial risks for all UK listed companies, making detailed disclosure a legal necessity. It claims that the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have failed to hold companies accountable, citing a series of complaints made by ClientEarth where regulators took no public enforcement action despite evidence of non-compliance. The report urges regulators to close this 'accountability gap' and encourages institutional investors to use their power to demand TCFD-aligned disclosures.