Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
Analysis TypeRe-analysis of experimental data
Clear all

1 result

  • This submission by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) to the Royal Society argues that original analyses of GM food experiments were flawed. SGR's re-examination of a study on glufosinate-resistant maize in chickens found that while average weights were similar to controls, the test group exhibited significantly more erratic weight gains and double the mortality rate. Similarly, a re-analysis of a 14-day study on PAT-protein in rats suggests that animals in high-dose groups failed to thrive, showing lower average weight-gain per day compared to control groups, contradicting the original study's findings of no significant differences.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Scientists for Global Responsibility

    Document type: Statement

Showing 1–1 of 1 document