Search Climate Insights Directory

A coalition of 290 organizations and individuals opposes H.R. 1734, asserting that the bill would weaken the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 2014 coal ash rule. The signatories argue the legislation would delay health protections, eliminate public access to information, and remove national standards for drinking water protection, thereby increasing risks to vulnerable communities and the environment.

A coalition of environmental organizations submitted a letter to the Joint Review Panel opposing the Shell Jackpine Mine Expansion. They argue that tar sands extraction causes direct mortality of migratory birds via tailings ponds, destroys critical breeding habitats, and leads to the decline of woodland caribou through habitat fragmentation and functional loss. The document highlights the specific vulnerability of the endangered whooping crane and argues that the project is not in the public interest due to these cumulative ecological threats and the acceleration of global warming.

A coalition of 301 public interest organizations opposes Senate bill S.3512, claiming it weakens regulations on toxic coal ash, shields utilities from liability, and removes the EPA's authority to regulate the nation's second largest industrial waste.

The document argues that nuclear power is an unsuitable solution for the UK's energy and climate goals due to long construction times, lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, high costs, and safety risks. The signatories advocate for redirecting investment toward energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other low-carbon technologies.