Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
Analysis TypeLegal survey
Clear all

2 results

  • The report examines national investment laws as versatile domestic policy instruments, tracing their evolution from 1950s development-driven codes to 1980-2010 models aligned with international treaty standards. It identifies seven primary functions of contemporary investment laws: governing admission, conferring incentives, facilitating investment, guaranteeing legal protection, managing disputes, specifying investor obligations, and monitoring oversight. The authors argue against 'off-the-shelf' models, suggesting instead a functional framework where design is tailored to national context and sustainable development objectives. The report warns against the risks of 'legal enclaves' and the potential for costly litigation when treaty-style protections and advance consent to international arbitration are incorporated into domestic law.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Regions: World
  • The report examines how national investment laws have evolved from domestic development tools in the 1950s to instruments reflecting international treaty standards between 1980 and 2010, and finally toward a modern era of diverse, context-specific designs. Based on a survey of 70 laws, it identifies seven primary functions of investment laws: governing admission, administering incentives, facilitating investment, guaranteeing legal protection, managing disputes, specifying investor obligations, and monitoring investment. The authors argue against 'off-the-shelf' models, instead proposing a framework where policy-makers first define their ultimate objectives—such as promoting sustainable development—and then determine which specific functions and legal structures are appropriate for their national context.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Showing 1–2 of 2 documents