Browse all documents

landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021-9d9d45c1d3060409.pdf

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Sustainable Landscape Finance Coalition Survey 1 results indicate that a plurality of conservation stakeholders face significant funding shortages, with 44.44% reporting insufficient financing. Key barriers include a reliance on short-term donor cycles and limited access to diverse funding streams. Respondents emphasized the importance of stakeholder collaboration and the integration of community needs to achieve long-term financial and environmental sustainability.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A significant portion of survey respondents report insufficient financing to meet their goals. Specifically, 44.44% of all survey responses indicated 'No' when asked if there is sufficient financing to achieve their goals, and 33.33% of all survey responses reported having only 0% – 25% of the financing required.
  • The primary challenges identified by respondents regarding sustainable financing include a heavy reliance on short-term donor funding (41.67% of all responses), limited access to finance (38.89% of all responses), and reliance on limited or singular income or funding streams (36.11% of all responses).
  • Respondents highlighted collaboration and community integration as critical for achieving conservation and financial sustainability. 44.44% of all responses rated 'Collaboration between stakeholders, such as conservation agencies, financial institutions, and communities' as important or most important, and 58.33% of all responses rated 'Integrating community needs and impacts as part of the finance solution' as important or most important.

Cite the original document

APA
WWF South Africa (n.d.). landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021-9d9d45c1d3060409.pdf. https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021.pdf
Chicago
WWF South Africa. landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021-9d9d45c1d3060409.pdf. n.d. https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=WWF South Africa |title=landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021-9d9d45c1d3060409.pdf |url=https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wwfsouthafricandlandscapecoalitionstakeholderneedsassessmentsurvey1results20219d9d45c1d3060409pdf, author = {{WWF South Africa}}, title = {{landscape\_coalition\_stakeholder\_needs\_assessment\_survey\_1\_results\_2021-9d9d45c1d3060409.pdf}}, institution = {WWF South Africa}, url = {https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/landscape_coalition_stakeholder_needs_assessment_survey_1_results_2021.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated