Course 3 Key Takeaways Stage 0: FIP Identification
Summary
The document outlines four best practices for designing Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs), including defining governance, conducting supply chain and socioeconomic analyses, and establishing funding plans. It provides a comprehensive list of external toolkits and organizations to support these activities, with specific resources for supply chain analysis, socioeconomic assessments, and general FIP identification.
Key insights
- The document recommends four core best practices for the design and development of a Fishery Improvement Project (FIP): defining the fishery, objectives, and governance from the outset; performing a supply chain analysis to identify stakeholders and the FIP type; conducting socioeconomic assessments to determine impacts and benefits; and creating a long-term funding plan with stakeholders.
Cite the original document
- APA
- WWF International (n.d.). Course 3 Key Takeaways Stage 0: FIP Identification. https://assets.worldwildlife.org/www-prd/documents/WWF_Course_3_JobAid.pdf
- Chicago
- WWF International. Course 3 Key Takeaways Stage 0: FIP Identification. n.d. https://assets.worldwildlife.org/www-prd/documents/WWF_Course_3_JobAid.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=WWF International |title=Course 3 Key Takeaways Stage 0: FIP Identification |url=https://assets.worldwildlife.org/www-prd/documents/WWF_Course_3_JobAid.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{wwfinternationalndcourse, author = {{WWF International}}, title = {{Course 3 Key Takeaways Stage 0: FIP Identification}}, institution = {WWF International}, url = {https://assets.worldwildlife.org/www-prd/documents/WWF_Course_3_JobAid.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated