Social Outcomes of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique
Summary
The evaluation of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique found that conservation interventions, such as no-take zones and mangrove management, initially increased dietary diversity by 25% between 2008 and 2014, though this correlation vanished by 2018 as investment declined. Farmer Field Schools were the most popular intervention, increasing the likelihood of year-round food security by 13%. While microcredit through Village Savings and Loan Associations led to a 31% increase in assets for female-headed households, the report notes that no-take zones primarily benefited male-headed households due to the cultural exclusion of single women from fishing. The document recommends better beneficiary targeting to avoid elite capture and stronger long-term governance to sustain community-based natural resource management.
Key insights
- Conservation interventions, including no-take zones and the management of community forests and mangroves, were linked to a 25% increase in dietary diversity from 2008 to 2014, but this correlation disappeared by 2018 following a decline in investment.
- Farmer Field Schools were the most widely favored Alliance intervention and were associated with a 13% increase in the likelihood of households experiencing food security throughout the entire year.
- The impact of interventions varied by gender and household structure: microcredit via Village Savings and Loan Associations increased reported assets for female-headed households by 31% (with no significant increase for male-headed households), whereas no-take zones were perceived to benefit male-headed households more than single women.
- Community-based natural resource management faces sustainability risks when external support is withdrawn; in one instance, the lack of equipment and the departure of WWF led to the collapse of forest monitoring and increased illegal invasions.
Cite the original document
- APA
- WWF International (2019). Social Outcomes of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/2624/Social-Outcomes-for-Alliance-in-Mozambique-Impact-Brief-2019-FINAL1_2_1.pdf
- Chicago
- WWF International. Social Outcomes of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique. 2019. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/2624/Social-Outcomes-for-Alliance-in-Mozambique-Impact-Brief-2019-FINAL1_2_1.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=WWF International |title=Social Outcomes of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique |date=2019 |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/2624/Social-Outcomes-for-Alliance-in-Mozambique-Impact-Brief-2019-FINAL1_2_1.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{wwfinternational2019social, author = {{WWF International}}, title = {{Social Outcomes of the CARE-WWF Alliance in Mozambique}}, institution = {WWF International}, year = {2019}, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/2624/Social-Outcomes-for-Alliance-in-Mozambique-Impact-Brief-2019-FINAL1_2_1.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated