Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the GHG footprints of soy production, emphasizing that land-use change (LUC) is the primary driver of emissions. It details emissions from farm-gate activities, processing, and transport, while comparing production systems and regional impacts, particularly in South America. Mitigation priorities focus on preventing deforestation and improving tillage and fertilizer practices.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Land-use change (LUC) is the dominant contributor to the GHG footprint of soy, with global averages from deforestation alone estimated between 1.2 and 1.6 kgCO2e/kg SB.
  • GHG emissions from soy vary significantly by region due to deforestation and habitat conversion; for example, farm-gate emissions in Brazil and Argentina are 2.9 and 2.4 kgCO2e/kg SB respectively, but drop to 0.47 and 0.41 kgCO2e/kg SB when LUC is excluded.
  • On-farm emissions excluding LUC typically range from 0.7 to 0.8 kgCO2e/kg SB, with primary sources being fertilizer production, soil emissions (N2O and CO2), and diesel use for machinery.
  • Tillage practices significantly influence emissions; conventional tillage has average farm-gate emissions of 0.9 kgCO2e/kg SB (excluding LUC), while no-till systems average 0.6 kgCO2e/kg SB and reduced tillage averages about 0.2 kgCO2e/kg SB.
  • Post-farm emissions include crushing and transport, with ground transportation in Brazil averaging 0.19 kgCO2e/kg SB due to heavy reliance on road transport over an average distance of 1,456 kilometers.
  • The most critical mitigation priority is preventing deforestation and other habitat conversion, as these are the largest sources of emissions. Other potential interventions include intercropping, reducing tillage, and precision agriculture.

Cite the original document

APA
Parajuli, R., Langford, Q., Tong, D., Moberg, E., & Thoma, G. (2022). Measuring and Mitigating GHGs: Soy. WWF International. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/212/4a8ktqu76j_soy_final.pdf
Chicago
Parajuli, Ranjan, Quinn Langford, Daniel Tong, Emily Moberg, and Greg Thoma. Measuring and Mitigating GHGs: Soy. WWF International, 2022. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/212/4a8ktqu76j_soy_final.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Parajuli |first1=Ranjan |last2=Langford |first2=Quinn |last3=Tong |first3=Daniel |last4=Moberg |first4=Emily |last5=Thoma |first5=Greg |title=Measuring and Mitigating GHGs: Soy |publisher=WWF International |date=19 September 2022 |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/212/4a8ktqu76j_soy_final.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{parajuli2022measuring, author = {Parajuli, Ranjan and Langford, Quinn and Tong, Daniel and Moberg, Emily and Thoma, Greg}, title = {{Measuring and Mitigating GHGs: Soy}}, institution = {WWF International}, year = {2022}, month = sep, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/212/4a8ktqu76j_soy_final.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated