Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The paper assesses the transparency of GHG emissions targets for eight top-emitting economies—Brazil, China, the EU, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, and the US—using the World Resources Institute's Open Book framework. While these parties generally followed the Lima Call for Climate Action, significant transparency gaps remain, particularly regarding land-sector accounting and market mechanisms. The analysis finds that absolute/base-year targets are generally presented more transparently than other target types. The document provides emissions trajectories through 2030 to quantify uncertainties caused by these gaps and recommends that parties provide more detailed assumptions, methodologies, and expected emission trajectories to improve accountability.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • All eight analyzed parties generally adhered to the basic reporting guidelines established in the Lima Call for Climate Action, addressing key categories such as time frames, scope, coverage, and target reference points.
  • Transparency gaps persist across all eight assessed parties, creating significant uncertainty in the resulting emissions calculations for some countries and cumulatively.
  • The type of emissions target influences the level of transparency; parties using absolute or base-year targets tend to be more transparent because the requirements for these targets are more straightforward.
  • There is a widespread lack of detail regarding the accounting approach for the land sector and the specific levels and double-counting protections for international market mechanisms.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies. https://www.wri.org/research/interpreting-indcs-assessing-transparency-post-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets-8-top
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/interpreting-indcs-assessing-transparency-post-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets-8-top.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies |url=https://www.wri.org/research/interpreting-indcs-assessing-transparency-post-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets-8-top |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendinterpreting, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/interpreting-indcs-assessing-transparency-post-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets-8-top}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated