Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document argues that while REDD+ countries are integrating governance arrangements into existing institutions, they rely too heavily on informal 'soft' accountability mechanisms and lack functional grievance redress systems. It emphasizes the need for explicitly defined power relationships between government institutions and the creation of legal frameworks with clear performance standards and sanctions to ensure accountability among stakeholders.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Accountability relationships between government institutions responsible for decision-making, implementation, consultation, monitoring, and grievance redress in REDD+ programs are generally ill defined, leading to potential institutional conflicts.
  • REDD+ countries frequently depend on informal 'soft' accountability mechanisms, particularly regarding information and participation, which often lack supporting legal frameworks, performance standards, or sanctions for noncompliance.
  • Despite high recognition of the potential for REDD+ activities to cause conflict, functional Feedback and Grievance Redress Mechanisms (FGRM) remain underdeveloped. A 2013 review of 32 readiness plans showed that over 90 percent of countries recognized the potential for conflict and 63 percent noted the importance of conflict resolution, yet limited progress has been made in implementing FGRMs.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs. https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs |url=https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendputting, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated