Browse all documents

Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper by the World Resources Institute provides a framework for REDD+ countries to strengthen accountability mechanisms. Based on a review of 20 Emissions Reduction Program Idea Notes (ER-PINs) submitted to the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s (FCPF’s) Carbon Fund, the paper identifies critical gaps in power relationship definitions, the formalization of rules, and the implementation of grievance redress mechanisms.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Accountability relationships among government institutions responsible for REDD+ decision-making, implementation, consultation, monitoring, and grievance redress are generally ill defined, leading to a need for more explicit definitions to prevent institutional conflicts and improve ownership.
  • REDD+ countries frequently depend on informal "soft" accountability mechanisms, especially regarding information and participation, which often lack enabling structures, supportive legal frameworks, clear performance standards, or sanctions for noncompliance.
  • While a 2013 review of 32 readiness plans indicated that over 90 percent of REDD+ countries acknowledge the potential for conflict and 63 percent view conflict resolution as important for goals, functional Feedback and Grievance Redress Mechanisms (FGRM) remain underdeveloped compared to other program elements.
  • REDD+ programs are viewed as tools for climate mitigation and as mechanisms to improve forest governance, sustainable land-use planning, biodiversity, environmental health, and rural livelihoods, provided they address underlying governance challenges.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs. https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs |url=https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendputting, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Putting Accountability Into Practice In REDD+ Programs}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/putting-accountability-practice-redd-programs}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated