Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes 26 submissions from 14 Parties and 12 Observers to the SBSTA concerning the design and implementation of a safeguard information system (SIS) for REDD+. To clarify the diverse inputs, the World Resources Institute and ClientEarth categorized the submissions into four areas: the role of the SIS, the type of information required, methods for collecting and providing information, and other elements of the international safeguard system.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The SBSTA received a total of 26 submissions regarding the safeguard information system, consisting of 14 from Parties and 12 from Observers, some of which represented multiple entities.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Map of SBSTA Submissions. https://www.wri.org/research/map-sbsta-submissions
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Map of SBSTA Submissions. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/map-sbsta-submissions.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Map of SBSTA Submissions |url=https://www.wri.org/research/map-sbsta-submissions |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendmap, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Map of SBSTA Submissions}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/map-sbsta-submissions}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated