Summary
The document examines the use of a "Compendium of Commitments" at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio +20) to ensure accountability for voluntary, time-bound pledges. It notes that previous "bottom up" initiatives, such as the 300+ partnerships from the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, largely failed due to a lack of monitoring and review. The paper highlights the tension between top-down binding treaties and voluntary pledges, arguing that for the Rio +20 compendium to be effective, it must establish robust frameworks to ensure commitments are specific, measurable, and ambitious enough to address global commons and fundamental human rights.
Key insights
- The proposed "Compendium of Commitments" for Rio +20 has faced criticism for employing a "bottom up", "pledge-and-review" strategy that may result in "business-as-usual outcomes" failing to meet sustainable development challenges.
- Past efforts to use public-private partnerships for implementation, specifically those launched at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, were largely unsuccessful; most of the 300+ partnerships did not survive or create significant change because they lacked meaningful performance monitoring and review.
- There is a documented shift in international environmental governance from "top down" treaty obligations, such as those in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, toward the "pledges" seen in the 2010 Cancun Agreements, although some interest in legally binding instruments persists.
- The effectiveness of a voluntary commitment registry at Rio +20 depends on solving four primary design challenges: ensuring commitments are specific and ambitious, ensuring aggregate action is sufficient for global commons and transboundary pollution, ensuring basic human rights and needs are respected, and creating a robust accountability framework in the absence of law.
Cite the original document
- APA
- World Resources Institute (n.d.). Promises Kept. https://www.wri.org/research/promises-kept
- Chicago
- World Resources Institute. Promises Kept. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/promises-kept.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Promises Kept |url=https://www.wri.org/research/promises-kept |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendpromises, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Promises Kept}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/promises-kept}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated