Monitoring Implementation and Effects of GHG Mitigation Policies: Steps to Develop Performance Indicators

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document outlines a three-step process for developing performance indicators to track GHG mitigation policies: formulating a list of possible indicators, selecting a feasible subset based on six guiding principles, and establishing a data collection and monitoring plan. It categorizes indicators into five primary types—input, activity, intermediate effect, GHG effects, and non-GHG effects—to assess both the delivery of resources and the resulting environmental, social, and economic changes.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The process for developing performance indicators consists of three sequential steps: formulating a list of potential indicators, selecting the specific indicators to be used for monitoring, and the subsequent collection and monitoring of data.
  • Policy monitoring indicators are classified into five main types: input indicators (tracking resource delivery), activity indicators (tracking actions by the implementing authority), and three result-oriented categories: intermediate effect, GHG effects, and non-GHG effects indicators. The paper also notes the use of transformation indicators for sector or economy-level change.
  • To narrow a broad list of possible indicators down to a feasible subset, the paper proposes six evaluation principles: indicators must be policy relevant, representative of various types, based on cost-effective or available data, supportive of meaningful comparisons, unambiguous and understandable, and reported frequently enough to track change.
  • The final stage of the process requires establishing specific data needs for each indicator, determining if existing data is usable, identifying collection methods for new data, and creating a formal monitoring plan to document the system.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Monitoring Implementation and Effects of GHG Mitigation Policies: Steps to Develop Performance Indicators. https://www.wri.org/research/monitoring-implementation-and-effects-ghg-mitigation-policies-steps-develop-performance
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Monitoring Implementation and Effects of GHG Mitigation Policies: Steps to Develop Performance Indicators. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/monitoring-implementation-and-effects-ghg-mitigation-policies-steps-develop-performance.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Monitoring Implementation and Effects of GHG Mitigation Policies: Steps to Develop Performance Indicators |url=https://www.wri.org/research/monitoring-implementation-and-effects-ghg-mitigation-policies-steps-develop-performance |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendmonitoring, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Monitoring Implementation and Effects of GHG Mitigation Policies: Steps to Develop Performance Indicators}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/monitoring-implementation-and-effects-ghg-mitigation-policies-steps-develop-performance}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated