AI in Strategic Foresight: Reshaping Anticipatory Governance

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report examines the integration of AI into strategic foresight, finding that while a majority of practitioners use AI to increase efficiency in trend analysis and scenario development, significant gaps in technical skills and ethical governance persist, particularly in the public sector.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A global survey of 167 foresight experts from 55 countries indicates that two-thirds of practitioners already integrate AI into their work, primarily for trend analysis or clustering (69%), scenario development (63%), and horizon scanning (60%).
  • There is a significant disparity in AI skill confidence across sectors; 93% of private sector respondents feel they have the relevant skills for AI in foresight, compared to only 53% in the public sector, 57% in civil society, and 59% in academia.
  • Practitioners use AI at three levels of maturity: basic analysis augmentation for research synthesis, as a creative sparring partner for idea generation and stress-testing, and a rare third level where AI is fully integrated and customized into the entire foresight workflow.
  • The primary benefit of AI in this field is time efficiency and acceleration (cited by 39%), as it handles repetitive, labour-intensive tasks, allowing experts to focus on higher-level analysis and critical thinking.
  • Significant concerns exist regarding the reliability of AI outputs, specifically regarding hallucinations, lack of transparency, and a limited capacity for inductive reasoning, which hinders the ability to identify low-probability signals and disruptions.
  • Ethical governance is lagging behind adoption; only 27% of experts using AI report that their organizations have formal ethical guidelines in place.

Cite the original document

APA
World Economic Forum (2025). AI in Strategic Foresight: Reshaping Anticipatory Governance. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_AI_in_Strategic_Foresight_2025.pdf
Chicago
World Economic Forum. AI in Strategic Foresight: Reshaping Anticipatory Governance. 2025. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_AI_in_Strategic_Foresight_2025.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Economic Forum |title=AI in Strategic Foresight: Reshaping Anticipatory Governance |date=November 2025 |url=https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_AI_in_Strategic_Foresight_2025.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldeconomicforum2025strategic, author = {{World Economic Forum}}, title = {{AI in Strategic Foresight: Reshaping Anticipatory Governance}}, institution = {World Economic Forum}, year = {2025}, month = nov, url = {https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_AI_in_Strategic_Foresight_2025.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated