Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The authors argue that the failure of markets to price carbon emissions leads to excessive fossil fuel use and global warming. They propose a 'back-of-the-envelope' rule to determine the optimal social cost of carbon, which they claim is a robust and transparent alternative to 'black box' integrated assessment models like DICE. Using a benchmark of 2% trend growth in living standards, an intergenerational aversion of 2, and no discounting of future welfare, the rule suggests an initial optimal price of $15 per ton of emitted CO2. The document demonstrates that this rule accurately predicts the timing of energy transitions and the necessary carbon budget to avoid the 4 degrees Celsius warming associated with 'business as usual' scenarios.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The authors propose a simplified rule for the global carbon price based on geophysical factors, such as carbon dissipation into oceanic sinks, and economic parameters including long-run productivity growth, time impatience, and intergenerational inequality aversion.
  • Under a benchmark scenario with 2% annual trend growth in living standards, an intergenerational aversion of 2, and no discounting of future generations' welfare, the optimal price is $15 per ton of emitted CO2, $55 per ton of emitted carbon, or $0.13 per gallon of gasoline, increasing annually by 2% in line with world GDP.
  • The optimal carbon price is sensitive to ethical and economic assumptions: discounting future welfare at 2% per annum reduces the price of CO2 to $5.5 per ton, while increasing intergenerational inequality aversion to 4 lowers the initial price of carbon to $10 per ton.
  • The proposed rule accurately predicts the optimal carbon budget and energy transition timing; while 'business as usual' leads to 4 degrees Celsius of warming and 1640 Giga tons of carbon burnt, the rule suggests a budget of 960 GtC and brings the transition to a carbon-free era forward by approximately 18 years.

Cite the original document

APA
Rezai, A., & van der Ploeg, R. (2015). How do we set a price on carbon? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/how-do-we-set-a-price-on-carbon/
Chicago
Rezai, Armon, and Rick van der Ploeg. How do we set a price on carbon? World Economic Forum, 2015. https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/how-do-we-set-a-price-on-carbon/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Rezai |first1=Armon |last2=van der Ploeg |first2=Rick |title=How do we set a price on carbon? |publisher=World Economic Forum |date=15 January 2015 |url=https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/how-do-we-set-a-price-on-carbon/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{rezai2015how, author = {Rezai, Armon and van der Ploeg, Rick}, title = {{How do we set a price on carbon?}}, institution = {World Economic Forum}, year = {2015}, month = jan, url = {https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/how-do-we-set-a-price-on-carbon/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated