Why complexity is a good thing for meeting global energy goals

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document advocates for a systems-level approach to the global energy transition, emphasizing that the inherent complexity of energy infrastructure—comprising diverse technologies, stakeholders, and resources—is an asset. It warns against 'locking in' unsustainable technologies and suggests leveraging existing infrastructure, such as reservoir hydro-generation and smart grids, to integrate variable renewables. The author asserts that because resource endowments and social contexts vary, nations must tailor their energy mixes through collaborative, integrated planning.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Meeting long-term goals for secure, economical, and sustainable energy requires global technology investments and a systems-level approach to determine the correct energy balance, as current energy mixes are insufficient for rising population and prosperity trends.
  • Short-term policy and investment decisions must be carefully managed to prevent the long-term adoption of unsustainable technologies, especially those with service lives spanning several decades.
  • Future energy systems will see increased technological complexity through the integration of electric vehicles, electricity-based heating, thermal storage for variable renewables, demand-response mechanisms, and hydrogen storage for power, heat, and transport.
  • To optimize new investments and accommodate variable renewables, systems should leverage existing infrastructure—such as improving base-load capacity flexibility, regional interconnections, and reservoir hydro-generation—and deploy smart grids to unlock demand-side resources.
  • Because there is no universal solution for technology deployment, nations and regions must adopt a systems-level approach that integrates technical and resource capabilities with social, market, and regulatory factors.

Cite the original document

APA
van der Hoeven, M. (2012). Why complexity is a good thing for meeting global energy goals. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/why-complexity-is-a-good-thing-for-meeting-global-energy-goals/
Chicago
van der Hoeven, Maria. Why complexity is a good thing for meeting global energy goals. World Economic Forum, 2012. https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/why-complexity-is-a-good-thing-for-meeting-global-energy-goals/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=van der Hoeven |first1=Maria |title=Why complexity is a good thing for meeting global energy goals |publisher=World Economic Forum |date=17 April 2012 |url=https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/why-complexity-is-a-good-thing-for-meeting-global-energy-goals/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{vanderhoeven2012why, author = {van der Hoeven, Maria}, title = {{Why complexity is a good thing for meeting global energy goals}}, publisher = {World Economic Forum}, year = {2012}, month = apr, url = {https://www.weforum.org/stories/energy-transition/why-complexity-is-a-good-thing-for-meeting-global-energy-goals/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated