Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

In 2008, New Jersey imported all the coal used by its power plants, resulting in $347 million leaving the state, including $93 million for international imports from countries such as Indonesia and Venezuela. While coal provided 14.1% of in-state electricity production, the state's overall energy demand exceeded its generation by 26%. The document argues that New Jersey can reduce this dependence by adopting energy efficiency resource standards and leveraging its technical potential for solar, bioenergy, and offshore wind, noting a state requirement for renewables to supply approximately 22% of power needs by 2020.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • In 2008, New Jersey imported 100% of the coal used by its power plants, with some sourced from Indonesia. This resulted in a total of $347 million being sent out of state to pay for these imports.
  • New Jersey ranked 7th among profiled states for spending on international coal imports, totaling $93 million. Specific international expenditures included $65 million to Indonesia and $28 million to Venezuela.
  • Coal accounted for 14.1% of New Jersey's in-state electricity production in 2008. However, the state's retail customers purchased 26% more power than the state generated internally, suggesting further imports of electricity that may have been coal-derived.
  • New Jersey has the technical capacity to meet 30% of its 2008 electricity requirements through renewable energy, specifically solar and bioenergy. Additionally, the state has mandated that utilities provide approximately 22% of power from renewable resources by 2020.
  • The document suggests that New Jersey could increase energy independence by adopting energy efficiency resource standards. In 2007, the state spent over $11 per person on ratepayer-funded efficiency programs, which reduced electricity use by 0.3%, though this spending was 3.5 times less than the state's expenditure on imported coal.

Cite the original document

APA
Union of Concerned Scientists (2010). New Jerseys Dependence on Imported Coal. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/UCS-BCBC-factsheet-New-Jersey.pdf
Chicago
Union of Concerned Scientists. New Jerseys Dependence on Imported Coal. 2010. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/UCS-BCBC-factsheet-New-Jersey.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Union of Concerned Scientists |title=New Jerseys Dependence on Imported Coal |date=May 2010 |url=https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/UCS-BCBC-factsheet-New-Jersey.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{unionofconcernedscientists2010new, author = {{Union of Concerned Scientists}}, title = {{New Jerseys Dependence on Imported Coal}}, institution = {Union of Concerned Scientists}, year = {2010}, month = may, url = {https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/UCS-BCBC-factsheet-New-Jersey.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated