Climate Accountability THE 2018 CLIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The 2018 Climate Accountability Scorecard evaluates Royal Dutch Shell's response to climate change, noting that while the company acknowledges climate science and supports the Paris Agreement in principle, it lacks a concrete net-zero action plan and maintains ties to industry groups that spread climate disinformation.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the scientific evidence of climate change and the necessity of achieving global net-zero CO2 emissions to limit temperature rise to below two degrees Celsius.
  • Despite its public statements, Shell has not established a company-wide net-zero emissions target or a concrete action plan aligned with the Paris Agreement's temperature goals.
  • Shell maintains leadership and membership roles in several trade associations that spread climate disinformation, including the American Petroleum Institute (API), National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), US Chamber of Commerce, and Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), and has not distanced itself from their claims.
  • The company has actively opposed shareholder efforts to implement climate targets, specifically recommending that shareholders vote against proposals from the NGO Follow This in 2017 and 2018.
  • Shell's disclosure of climate risks is incomplete; while it acknowledges physical risks like weather, it does not explicitly link them to climate change, nor does it identify specific laws or regulations regarding climate change risks in its financial filings.
  • Shell demonstrates a strong policy against corporate political contributions to candidates and parties, and it is a founding member of the Climate Leadership Council and the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative.

Cite the original document

APA
Union of Concerned Scientists (2018). Climate Accountability THE 2018 CLIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-Accountability-scorecard18-Shell.pdf
Chicago
Union of Concerned Scientists. Climate Accountability THE 2018 CLIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD. 2018. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-Accountability-scorecard18-Shell.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Union of Concerned Scientists |title=Climate Accountability THE 2018 CLIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD |date=October 2018 |url=https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-Accountability-scorecard18-Shell.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{unionofconcernedscientists2018climate, author = {{Union of Concerned Scientists}}, title = {{Climate Accountability THE 2018 CLIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD}}, institution = {Union of Concerned Scientists}, year = {2018}, month = oct, url = {https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-Accountability-scorecard18-Shell.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated