Summary
A Union of Concerned Scientists analysis of non-transportation BIL awards in California from fiscal years 2022 and 2023 indicates that local investments are likely falling short of Justice40 goals. Depending on the screening tool used, only 9.4% to 18.2% of analyzed local funding is flowing to designated disadvantaged communities. The report highlights significant data gaps, particularly regarding statewide formula funding, and recommends a transparent, unified tracking system and a clear definition of 'benefits' to ensure equitable infrastructure spending.
Key insights
- Local, non-transportation Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) investments in California are likely failing to meet Justice40 goals. Based on a spatial analysis of 241 local awards totaling $779.29 million, only 18.2% of funding flowed to communities designated as disadvantaged by the federal Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), and only 9.4% flowed to those designated by California's SB 535.
- A significant portion of BIL funding in California is allocated as statewide awards, which limits the ability to track whether funds reach priority communities. Of the 401 analyzed awards totaling $2.17 billion, 63% ($1.36 billion) had a statewide scope, with California state agencies controlling over 96% of this funding.
- Federally recognized Tribal recipients are a primary driver of equitable funding, accounting for more than one-third (37%) of all analyzed funding flowing to underserved and overburdened communities in California. Forty Tribal recipients received $71.01 million, with the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program providing nearly half of that amount ($30.88 million).
- The California State Water Resources Control Board received the vast majority of statewide BIL funding, totaling $1.19 billion (87% of the statewide total) for Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (SRF). While these programs prioritize disadvantaged communities in their Intended Use Plans, the report notes that non-disadvantaged communities may receive awards sooner because they often have 'shovel-ready' projects.
- Current federal spending data on USASpending.gov is insufficient for comprehensive Justice40 assessments. The report identifies issues such as the lack of a 'place of performance' option for Tribal areas and the absence of Disaster Emergency Fund (DEF) codes for Inflation Reduction Act investments.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Fencl, A., Rempel, J., Klein, G., Kyn, M., Mitchell, R., & Yao, A. (2024). Follow the Money. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Follow-the-Money-Report-v2.pdf
- Chicago
- Fencl, Amanda, Jenny Rempel, Georgia Klein, Mo Kyn, Ryder Mitchell, and Allyson Yao. Follow the Money. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2024. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Follow-the-Money-Report-v2.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Fencl |first1=Amanda |last2=Rempel |first2=Jenny |last3=Klein |first3=Georgia |last4=Kyn |first4=Mo |last5=Mitchell |first5=Ryder |last6=Yao |first6=Allyson |title=Follow the Money |publisher=Union of Concerned Scientists |date=June 2024 |url=https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Follow-the-Money-Report-v2.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{fencl2024follow, author = {Fencl, Amanda and Rempel, Jenny and Klein, Georgia and Kyn, Mo and Mitchell, Ryder and Yao, Allyson}, title = {{Follow the Money}}, institution = {Union of Concerned Scientists}, year = {2024}, month = jun, url = {https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Follow-the-Money-Report-v2.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated