Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This document is a legal conclusion submitted by the 'Gerakan Rakyat Menggugat Proyek Strategis Nasional' (GERAM PSN) to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. It argues that several provisions of Law No. 6 of 2023 (the Job Creation Law) regarding the 'ease and acceleration' of National Strategic Projects (PSN) are unconstitutional, claiming they facilitate land grabbing, environmental destruction, and the violation of human rights, including the right to food and a healthy environment.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The petitioners argue that Article 3 letter d of Law No. 6 of 2023 contains vague norms regarding 'ease and acceleration' of National Strategic Projects (PSN), which creates a risk of arbitrary power and violates the constitutional guarantee of legal certainty.
  • The document claims that expanding the definition of 'public interest' to include industrial estates initiated or controlled by the government or state/regional enterprises (Article 10 letter u) allows private entities to profit from state facilities, specifically in land acquisition.
  • The petitioners assert that allowing business entities to conduct land acquisition for PSNs under the guise of 'public interest' (Article 173 paragraphs 2 and 4) erodes the State's Right of Control (HMN) and prioritizes private capital over public welfare.
  • The document argues that provisions allowing the conversion of sustainable agricultural land for PSNs (Article 19 paragraph 2 in Article 31 number 1 and Article 44 paragraph 2 in Article 124 number 1) violate the right to food and nutrition.
  • The removal of the requirement for House of Representatives (DPR) approval for changes in forest area designation (Article 19 paragraph 2 in Article 36 number 3) is described as 'executive aggrandizement' that eliminates checks and balances and threatens the environment.
  • The petitioners claim that the ability to bypass Spatial Plans (RTR) and Zoning Plans (RZ) for PSNs (Article 17A and Article 34A) leads to large-scale land conversion, deforestation, and the marginalization of indigenous and local communities.
  • The document provides specific examples of PSN impacts, including the loss of ancestral lands in Merauke (Food Estate), forced evictions in Rempang (Rempang Eco City), and environmental degradation in North Kalimantan (KIPI) and Southeast Sulawesi (nickel smelting).

Cite the original document

APA
Trend Asia (2025). Kesimpulan Perkara Nomor 112/PUU-XXIII/2025. https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/KESIMPULAN-PEMOHON-112.pdf
Chicago
Trend Asia. Kesimpulan Perkara Nomor 112/PUU-XXIII/2025. 2025. https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/KESIMPULAN-PEMOHON-112.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Trend Asia |title=Kesimpulan Perkara Nomor 112/PUU-XXIII/2025 |date=14 October 2025 |url=https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/KESIMPULAN-PEMOHON-112.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{trendasia2025kesimpulan, author = {{Trend Asia}}, title = {{Kesimpulan Perkara Nomor 112/PUU-XXIII/2025}}, publisher = {Trend Asia}, year = {2025}, month = oct, url = {https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/KESIMPULAN-PEMOHON-112.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated