Promoting locally inclusive wetlands conservation – experience from Myanmar

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document highlights the rapid degradation of wetlands in Myanmar, noting a 25% loss in the Upper Chindwin River basin between 2000 and 2020. It critiques existing government-led initiatives for being tokenistic and limited primarily to Ramsar sites, leaving smaller wetlands vulnerable. Based on a project in the Hkamti region, the authors demonstrate that community leadership—through village working committees and alternative livelihood planning—enhances resource management and monitoring. The brief recommends establishing a community-led management framework, diversifying funding, and integrating wetland conservation across sectoral policies like agriculture and tourism.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Upper Chindwin River basin experienced a 25% reduction in wetland area from 2000 to 2020, impacting a key biodiversity area.
  • Myanmar's wetlands have seen significant decline, including a 0.7% annual decline and the loss of approximately 475 km2 of peatland between 1999 and 2019.
  • As of 2020, Myanmar's wetlands covered over 80,000 km2, but the majority are human-made, with rice paddy fields accounting for 61% of the total extent.
  • Current government-led wetland management is often ineffective because community participation is tokenistic and lacks the decentralization of power or local decision-making authority.
  • In the Hkamti region of the Upper Chindwin basin, community-led action plans and the establishment of village working committees have improved sustainable resource use and monitoring capacity.
  • The development of alternative livelihoods, such as organic farming, sustainable aquaculture, and pig farming, has reduced direct community dependence on wetland resources.

Cite the original document

APA
Saluja, R., Prasad, S., Maung, W., & Piman, T. (2025). Promoting locally inclusive wetlands conservation – experience from Myanmar. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/locally-inclusive-wetlands-myanmar-sei2025-028.pdf
Chicago
Saluja, Ridhi, Satish Prasad, Win Maung, and Thanapon Piman. Promoting locally inclusive wetlands conservation – experience from Myanmar. Stockholm Environment Institute, 2025. https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/locally-inclusive-wetlands-myanmar-sei2025-028.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Saluja |first1=Ridhi |last2=Prasad |first2=Satish |last3=Maung |first3=Win |last4=Piman |first4=Thanapon |title=Promoting locally inclusive wetlands conservation – experience from Myanmar |publisher=Stockholm Environment Institute |date=May 2025 |url=https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/locally-inclusive-wetlands-myanmar-sei2025-028.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{saluja2025promoting, author = {Saluja, Ridhi and Prasad, Satish and Maung, Win and Piman, Thanapon}, title = {{Promoting locally inclusive wetlands conservation – experience from Myanmar}}, institution = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2025}, month = may, url = {https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/locally-inclusive-wetlands-myanmar-sei2025-028.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated