Browse all documents

First empirical comparison of energy footprints embodied in trade: MRIO versus PLUM

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper compares two methods for calculating energy footprints embodied in trade for the United Kingdom in 2002: the National Footprint Accounts' Product Land Use Matrix (NFA-PLUM) and a multi-region input–output model (MRIO). While total import and export figures are comparable between the two, the study finds significant discrepancies when results are broken down by economic sector.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A comparison of energy footprints for the United Kingdom in 2002 shows that while total imports and exports are comparable between the NFA-PLUM and MRIO methods, there is little correlation and large differences when the data is analyzed by economic sector.
  • The discrepancies in the NFA-PLUM method are attributed to the exclusion of trade in services (specifically transport), the omission of upstream impacts of fossil fuels, and the application of incorrect embodied energy factors.
  • The author concludes that an input–output based approach is superior for comprehensive footprint accounting of trade, as MRIO models can track origins through international supply chains, inter-industry linkages, and multi-national trade flows.

Cite the original document

APA
Stockholm Environment Institute (2009). First empirical comparison of energy footprints embodied in trade: MRIO versus PLUM. https://www.sei.org/publications/first-empirical-comparison-energy-footprints-embodied-trade-mrio-versus-plum/
Chicago
Stockholm Environment Institute. First empirical comparison of energy footprints embodied in trade: MRIO versus PLUM. 2009. https://www.sei.org/publications/first-empirical-comparison-energy-footprints-embodied-trade-mrio-versus-plum/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Stockholm Environment Institute |title=First empirical comparison of energy footprints embodied in trade: MRIO versus PLUM |date=1 May 2009 |url=https://www.sei.org/publications/first-empirical-comparison-energy-footprints-embodied-trade-mrio-versus-plum/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{stockholmenvironmentinstitute2009first, author = {{Stockholm Environment Institute}}, title = {{First empirical comparison of energy footprints embodied in trade: MRIO versus PLUM}}, institution = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2009}, month = may, url = {https://www.sei.org/publications/first-empirical-comparison-energy-footprints-embodied-trade-mrio-versus-plum/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated