Critique Keystone Paper Response
Summary
The authors of a Nature Climate Change article respond to a critique by Dr. Michael Levi regarding their analysis of the Keystone XL pipeline's impact on global emissions. They defend their use of a simple, transparent global oil model over complex 'black box' models, arguing that their approach allows for the examination of alternative assumptions and a range of possible supply responses.
Key insights
- The authors' analysis of the Keystone XL pipeline suggests that global emissions could increase by 0 to 110 million tonnes CO2e annually, depending on how much the pipeline increases oil sands production.
- The authors argue that the U.S. State Department's final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project fails to adequately consider the dynamic relationships between oil production, prices, and demand.
- The authors' central case for supply elasticity (0.13) is based on a 2020 oil consumption forecast of 96.62 million barrels per day from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which corresponds to an expected price of $101.
- In a low-price scenario where oil is between $65 and $75 per barrel, the authors' model yields an emissions impact of up to 54 million tonnes CO2e annually, assuming a higher supply elasticity of approximately 0.85.
- The authors contend that market effects of energy supply investments are often neglected and can be significantly greater than typically accounted for in official analyses.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Stockholm Environment Institute (2014). Critique Keystone Paper Response. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/critique-keystone-paper-response/
- Chicago
- Stockholm Environment Institute. Critique Keystone Paper Response. 2014. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/critique-keystone-paper-response/.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite press release |author=Stockholm Environment Institute |title=Critique Keystone Paper Response |date=15 August 2014 |url=https://www.sei.org/perspectives/critique-keystone-paper-response/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @misc{stockholmenvironmentinstitute2014critique, author = {{Stockholm Environment Institute}}, title = {{Critique Keystone Paper Response}}, publisher = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2014}, month = aug, url = {https://www.sei.org/perspectives/critique-keystone-paper-response/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated