State of the Market Report for Healthcare Facility Electrification

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report highlights a significant global energy gap in healthcare, with an estimated 1 billion people lacking reliable power at local facilities. While electrification initiatives grew by 47% annually between 2018 and 2021, the sector faces a USD 4.9 billion investment gap, primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The analysis advocates for a shift from grant-based Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) models to long-term service-based models like Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) to ensure sustainable operations and maintenance.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A massive energy access gap exists in global healthcare, with approximately 1 billion people having local facilities with unreliable power. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 25,000 facilities have no electricity and 70,000 have unreliable supply, while 12% of facilities in South Asia lack any access.
  • Healthcare electrification saw rapid growth during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an average annual growth rate of 47% between 2018 and 2021. Stand-alone solar technology is the dominant choice, used in 82% of initiatives.
  • There is a critical funding shortfall for healthcare electrification, with a total estimated investment need of USD 4.9 billion across 63 low- and middle-income countries. The largest gaps are in Sub-Saharan Africa (USD 2.5 billion) and South Asia (USD 2 billion).
  • The sector is transitioning from short-term Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) models, which often neglect long-term operations and maintenance (O&M), toward service-based models such as Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) and 'energy-as-a-service'.
  • Technological trends are shifting toward more efficient and scalable solutions, including the use of lithium-ion batteries, monocrystalline wafers, and passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) designs, alongside the integration of remote monitoring and AI for system management.
  • Climate finance, including renewable energy certificates (RECs), grants, and concessional loans, is identified as a promising funding avenue to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase health facility resilience.

Cite the original document

APA
Sustainable Energy for All (2024). State of the Market Report for Healthcare Facility Electrification. https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2024-02/Executive%20Summary_SOTM_EN.pdf
Chicago
Sustainable Energy for All. State of the Market Report for Healthcare Facility Electrification. 2024. https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2024-02/Executive%20Summary_SOTM_EN.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Sustainable Energy for All |title=State of the Market Report for Healthcare Facility Electrification |date=February 2024 |url=https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2024-02/Executive%20Summary_SOTM_EN.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{sustainableenergyforall2024state, author = {{Sustainable Energy for All}}, title = {{State of the Market Report for Healthcare Facility Electrification}}, institution = {Sustainable Energy for All}, year = {2024}, month = feb, url = {https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2024-02/Executive%20Summary_SOTM_EN.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated