CAN WORKPLACE SECONDMENTS BUILD TRUST IN THE MINING SECTOR?

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document argues that the relationship between the South African government and the mining industry is characterized by mutual suspicion, leading to economic costs such as underinvestment and lost productivity. It proposes a long-term, co-funded secondment programme where public servants work within mining companies for 9 to 18 months to deepen mutual understanding and technical expertise. While acknowledging risks like potential corruption or brain drain to the private sector, the author asserts that rigorous design and a 5 to 10 year implementation horizon can mitigate these issues and serve as a model for the rest of Africa.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The relationship between the South African government and mining companies is marked by mutual suspicion and an impasse, with the government relying on legislative measures and the private sector responding through litigation.
  • Sub-optimal relations in the mining sector have resulted in significant economic consequences, including divestment, job losses, and productivity drops due to safety stoppages.
  • Inappropriate applications of Section 54 of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1996 caused member companies of the Chamber of Mines to lose ZAR 4.8 billion in 2015, with total losses from 2012 to 2015 estimated at ZAR 13.63 billion.
  • While secondments are mentioned in the National Development Plan and the Africa Mining Vision, substantive implementation of such programmes remains rare across Africa due to resource requirements, fears of corruption, and concerns over public servants leaving for the private sector.
  • To be effective, a secondment programme should be co-funded, last between 9 and 18 months per individual, and be maintained as a systemic process for 5 to 10 years.

Cite the original document

APA
van Onselen, J. (2017). CAN WORKPLACE SECONDMENTS BUILD TRUST IN THE MINING SECTOR? South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Policy-Briefing-159.pdf
Chicago
van Onselen, Jessica. CAN WORKPLACE SECONDMENTS BUILD TRUST IN THE MINING SECTOR? South African Institute of International Affairs, 2017. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Policy-Briefing-159.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=van Onselen |first1=Jessica |title=CAN WORKPLACE SECONDMENTS BUILD TRUST IN THE MINING SECTOR? |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=January 2017 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Policy-Briefing-159.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{vanonselen2017can, author = {van Onselen, Jessica}, title = {{CAN WORKPLACE SECONDMENTS BUILD TRUST IN THE MINING SECTOR?}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2017}, month = jan, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Policy-Briefing-159.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated