SOUTH AFRICA’S HAZARDOUS BALLET WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The policy brief examines the decline of human rights as a cornerstone of South African foreign policy, contrasting the country's strong domestic human rights framework with its controversial voting record at the UN Security Council and UN Human Rights Council. The author contends that this 'de-norming' undermines South Africa's role as a bridge-builder and normative leader in Africa and the Global South. To reverse this trend, the document recommends a three-point action plan: reconceptualising human rights diplomacy through a national 'indaba', strengthening bilateral ties with human rights-promoting nations, and increasing civil society pressure for government accountability.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Since its transition in 1994, South Africa has shifted from positioning human rights as the center of its foreign policy to relegating them to the periphery of its diplomatic practice.
  • South Africa's voting record during its tenures as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council (2007-2008 and 2011-2012) demonstrates a lack of consistency with human rights norms, including voting against resolutions regarding human rights abuses in Myanmar and sanctions against Robert Mugabe's regime in Zimbabwe.
  • The author describes South Africa's record at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) as 'ominous', citing instances where the country voted with states having poor human rights records and showed policy incoherence regarding the appointment of an independent expert on gender identity and sexual orientation.
  • There is a stark contradiction between South Africa's domestic institutionalisation of human rights—supported by an independent judiciary and Chapter 9 institutions—and its 'de-norming' of human rights in multilateral diplomacy.
  • The document proposes a three-part recovery plan: conducting a strategic 'indaba' to re-conceptualise human rights diplomacy (including appointing a human rights envoy in DIRCO), leveraging relationships with human rights-promoting countries, and increasing domestic civil society pressure on the government.

Cite the original document

APA
HENGARI, A. T. (2018). SOUTH AFRICA’S HAZARDOUS BALLET WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Policy-Insights-53.pdf
Chicago
HENGARI, ALFREDO TJIURIMO. SOUTH AFRICA’S HAZARDOUS BALLET WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2018. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Policy-Insights-53.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=HENGARI |first1=ALFREDO TJIURIMO |title=SOUTH AFRICA’S HAZARDOUS BALLET WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=March 2018 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Policy-Insights-53.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{hengari2018south, author = {HENGARI, ALFREDO TJIURIMO}, title = {{SOUTH AFRICA’S HAZARDOUS BALLET WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIPLOMACY}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2018}, month = mar, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Policy-Insights-53.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated