Browse all documents

Benchmarking South Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This policy brief examines South Africa's Promotion and Protection of Investment Bill of 2013 (PPIB), analyzing how it shifts the country's approach to foreign direct investment (FDI) by prioritizing national development and sovereign regulatory rights over traditional international investment treaty protections.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Promotion and Protection of Investment Bill of 2013 (PPIB) represents a significant shift from South Africa's previous bilateral investment treaties (BITs) by limiting the role of international investment agreements and replacing international arbitration with domestic dispute resolution.
  • The PPIB introduces a more restrictive definition of 'investment' compared to typical BITs, requiring that an investment demonstrate a significant physical presence or material economic investment rather than just contractual rights.
  • A major point of concern for attracting FDI is the PPIB's approach to expropriation, which excludes compensable indirect expropriation for measures taken to protect public welfare, state security, or environmental protection.
  • The PPIB departs from the international standard of market-value compensation for expropriation, instead adopting a constitutional model that balances public interest with the interests of the affected parties.
  • South Africa's proposed domestic policy is misaligned with the SADC Finance and Investment Protocol (FIP), which continues to offer BIT-type protections such as fair and equitable treatment and international arbitration.
  • The author suggests that SADC member states should harmonize their policies by terminating the FIP investment annex and adopting the SADC Model BIT, which balances state regulatory interests with investor protections more effectively.
  • To successfully attract sustainable FDI, South Africa must look beyond legal frameworks and improve the quality of its governance institutions, political stability, and the performance of public institutions to ensure policy coherence.

Cite the original document

APA
ADeleke, F. (2015). Benchmarking South Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Policy-Insights-13.pdf
Chicago
ADeleke, FolA. Benchmarking South Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2015. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Policy-Insights-13.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=ADeleke |first1=FolA |title=Benchmarking South Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=13 April 2015 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Policy-Insights-13.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{adeleke2015benchmarking, author = {ADeleke, FolA}, title = {{Benchmarking South Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2015}, month = apr, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Policy-Insights-13.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated