Browse all documents

Corporate Governance of State-Owned Extractive Companies: What Uganda Can Learn From Norway

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This policy briefing analyzes the proposed corporate governance framework for Uganda's forthcoming national oil company (NOC), comparing it with the state-owned enterprise (SOE) model in Norway. The author argues that Uganda's current legislative approach is insufficient and recommends adopting stakeholder-oriented guidelines and a centralized supervisory body similar to Norway's Department of State Ownership to prevent corruption and government interference.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Uganda's current corporate governance framework is deemed insufficient for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) because it focuses on shareholders rather than a broader range of stakeholders, such as citizens and employees.
  • The Petroleum Bills of 2012 establish a national oil company (NOC) in Uganda, but the author contends that the legal regime fails to protect the entity from corruption or overt government interference due to non-mandatory transparency provisions.
  • Norway's SOE governance framework is highlighted as a best-practice model based on OECD guidelines, emphasizing transparency, performance targets, and the protection of stakeholders.
  • A key feature of the Norwegian model is the prevention of political interference in company management; specifically, ministers, members of parliament, and line ministry officials are prohibited from serving on SOE boards of directors.
  • Norway utilizes a 'corporate assembly' for companies with more than 200 employees, allowing employees to elect a portion of the assembly, which serves as a mechanism for stakeholder involvement.
  • The author recommends that the Ugandan government establish a central institution to supervise SOEs and the NOC, modeled after Norway's Department of State Ownership, to ensure regulatory compliance.

Cite the original document

APA
Kyepa, T. (2013). Corporate Governance of State-Owned Extractive Companies: What Uganda Can Learn From Norway. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Policy-Briefing-64.pdf
Chicago
Kyepa, Timothy. Corporate Governance of State-Owned Extractive Companies: What Uganda Can Learn From Norway. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2013. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Policy-Briefing-64.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Kyepa |first1=Timothy |title=Corporate Governance of State-Owned Extractive Companies: What Uganda Can Learn From Norway |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=March 2013 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Policy-Briefing-64.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{kyepa2013corporate, author = {Kyepa, Timothy}, title = {{Corporate Governance of State-Owned Extractive Companies: What Uganda Can Learn From Norway}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2013}, month = mar, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Policy-Briefing-64.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated