Nuanced Balancing Act: South Africa’s National and International Interests and its ‘African Agenda’
Summary
The paper argues that South Africa's foreign policy is often over-extended and lacks focus, attempting to balance competing agendas across the AU, Brics, and the UN Security Council. It highlights a tension between the government's 'Afrocentric' approach and the domestic imperatives of poverty reduction and economic growth outlined by the National Planning Commission. The author suggests that a 'diplomacy of Ubuntu'—emphasizing common humanity and interdependence—could potentially bridge the gap between international ambitions and national interests, provided that the state increases domestic participation in foreign policy formulation through mechanisms like the South African Council on International Relations (Sacoir).
Key insights
- South Africa's international engagements are characterized by a lack of clear focus because the government is attempting to serve too many international agendas simultaneously, leading to a state of being over-extended.
- There is a perceived disconnect between South Africa's domestic commitment to human rights and its international actions, specifically its reluctance to censure African dictators within the AU and its vacillating positions at the UN regarding interventions in Syria, Libya, Iran, and Zimbabwe.
- The National Planning Commission (NPC) recommends that South Africa re-evaluate its global and regional positioning to ensure that domestic realities and the wellbeing of its people take precedence over political ambitions or notions of solidarity regarding African integration.
- South Africa's 'African Agenda' aims to end the continent's marginalization and uses Brics as a platform to amplify African voices, though this is complicated by competition among Brics members for African natural resources.
- The 'diplomacy of Ubuntu' is presented by the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) as a value-based approach focusing on common humanity, interdependence, and a shift from 'power to partnership' in international relations.
- The establishment of the South African Council on International Relations (Sacoir) represents an effort to increase domestic participation and public debate in the formulation of foreign policy, aligning with the philosophy of Ubuntu.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Bohler-Muller, N. (2012). Nuanced Balancing Act: South Africa’s National and International Interests and its ‘African Agenda’. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Occasional-Paper-120.pdf
- Chicago
- Bohler-Muller, Narnia. Nuanced Balancing Act: South Africa’s National and International Interests and its ‘African Agenda’. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2012. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Occasional-Paper-120.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Bohler-Muller |first1=Narnia |title=Nuanced Balancing Act: South Africa’s National and International Interests and its ‘African Agenda’ |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=September 2012 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Occasional-Paper-120.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{bohlermuller2012nuanced, author = {Bohler-Muller, Narnia}, title = {{Nuanced Balancing Act: South Africa’s National and International Interests and its ‘African Agenda’}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2012}, month = sep, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Occasional-Paper-120.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated