Summary
The report finds that investor climate targets are often opaque, lack ambition, and are poorly linked to real-world emission reductions. Analysis of 83 global investors reveals that many targets rely on volatile financial metrics, exclude scope 3 emissions, and are frequently reported as achieved long before their deadlines. The document recommends that investors adopt science-based sectoral targets, increase transparency in reporting, and align climate solutions investments with established taxonomies.
Key insights
- A significant portion of the analyzed investors lack comprehensive climate strategies; 22% of the 83 investors in scope have no targets at all, and 58% have five targets or fewer.
- Many emissions targets use financial-based metrics—such as absolute financed emissions, WACI, or carbon footprint—that are weakly correlated with real-world emissions because they are influenced by inflation and corporate value growth.
- There is a widespread failure to cover material emission sources, with 58% of emissions targets excluding scope 3 emissions and no targets specifically addressing methane.
- Asset class coverage is uneven and often undisclosed; nearly 75% of targets do not disclose the percentage of assets under management (AUM) covered, and when disclosed, the average coverage is less than 50%.
- A high number of targets are reported as achieved prematurely, suggesting low initial ambition; 60% of short-term targets (mostly 2025) and 15% of medium-term targets (mostly 2030) have already been met.
- Alignment and engagement targets are often based on vague or opaque metrics that lack the transparency needed to prevent greenwashing.
- Climate solutions investment targets are largely non-comparable due to varying definitions of 'green' or 'sustainable' and often lack taxonomic clarity.
- Existing net-zero alliances, such as the NZAOA, NZAM, and PAAO, have failed to provide sufficiently prescriptive guidance on how to design meaningful targets.
Cite the original document
- APA
- McCully, P. (2026). TARGETING FAILURE. Reclaim Finance. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Targeting-failure.pdf
- Chicago
- McCully, Patrick. TARGETING FAILURE. Reclaim Finance, 2026. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Targeting-failure.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=McCully |first1=Patrick |title=TARGETING FAILURE |publisher=Reclaim Finance |date=January 2026 |url=https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Targeting-failure.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{mccully2026targeting, author = {McCully, Patrick}, title = {{TARGETING FAILURE}}, institution = {Reclaim Finance}, year = {2026}, month = jan, url = {https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Targeting-failure.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated