SLOW BURN: Les gestionnaires d’actifs parient contre le climat

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report finds that most major asset managers maintain a gap between long-term net-zero commitments and short-term actions, with significant exposure to coal remaining in passive investment strategies. Only a small fraction of assets are covered by robust coal exclusion criteria, and passive funds are almost entirely excluded from such policies, creating a 'time bomb' for the climate.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Less than half of the 29 evaluated asset managers have a public coal exclusion policy. Major firms such as Vanguard, PIMCO, and Schroders have not adopted such policies.
  • Coal exclusion policies are often limited in scope; only 25% of all assets managed in the sample were covered by a coal exclusion criterion. Even managers with policies, such as BlackRock, Legal & General Investment Management, and UBS AM, apply them to less than 40% of their assets.
  • Exclusion criteria are generally weak, with only 20% of asset managers excluding companies with coal expansion projects. Consequently, only 3,400 billion euros of the 23,000 billion euros covered by long-term climate commitments exclude companies with coal expansion projects.
  • Passive investment strategies represent a major climate risk, accounting for over 45% of assets managed by the 29 firms but almost never covered by coal exclusions. For the largest passive managers in the sample, less than 3% of passively managed investments are covered by a coal exclusion criterion.
  • While half of the asset managers publicly recommend that portfolio companies align with the Paris Agreement, none systematically define time-limited demands or apply sanctions for lack of short-term progress.
  • The report identifies a lack of consistency in how policies are applied to investment mandates, which represent 55% of the total investments managed by the sample. Only a few managers, such as Ostrum AM and AXA IM, have robust policies that apply by default to dedicated funds and mandates.

Cite the original document

APA
Cuvelier, L. (2021). SLOW BURN: Les gestionnaires d’actifs parient contre le climat. Reclaim Finance. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rapport_Slow_Burn_Final_FR.pdf
Chicago
Cuvelier, Lara. SLOW BURN: Les gestionnaires d’actifs parient contre le climat. Reclaim Finance, 2021. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rapport_Slow_Burn_Final_FR.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Cuvelier |first1=Lara |title=SLOW BURN: Les gestionnaires d’actifs parient contre le climat |publisher=Reclaim Finance |date=April 2021 |url=https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rapport_Slow_Burn_Final_FR.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{cuvelier2021slow, author = {Cuvelier, Lara}, title = {{SLOW BURN: Les gestionnaires d’actifs parient contre le climat}}, institution = {Reclaim Finance}, year = {2021}, month = apr, url = {https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rapport_Slow_Burn_Final_FR.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated