Japanese banks still have to catch up with their European peers on coal

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

Reclaim Finance argues that Japan's three megabanks (Mizuho, MUFG, and SMBC) maintain policies that allow continued support for the coal industry. While the banks have updated policies to restrict direct project financing for new coal plants 'in principle', these policies contain exceptions and do not apply to general corporate financing. Between October 2018 and October 2020, these banks provided $39bn, $36bn, and $32bn respectively to companies on the Global Coal Exit List. The document contrasts this with European peers like Crédit Agricole and notes increasing shareholder and activist pressure on the Japanese institutions to align with the Paris Agreement.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Mizuho, MUFG, and SMBC have updated their coal policies to restrict direct financing of new coal plants 'in principle', but these policies include exceptions and do not align with the Paris Agreement.
  • The three banks continue to support the coal industry through indirect general corporate finance, which is not covered by their project-specific exclusion policies.
  • Between October 2018 and October 2020, Mizuho, MUFG, and SMBC provided $39bn, $36bn, and $32bn respectively to companies listed on the Global Coal Exit List (GCEL).
  • Financial data from 2016-2018 shows the banks provided billions to developers with significant coal pipelines: Mizuho provided $24bn to 37 developers (including China Huadian), MUFG provided $23bn to 30 developers (including Power Finance Corporation), and SMBC provided $27bn to 36 developers (including PLN).
  • The Japanese banks face increasing pressure from shareholders and activists, including a shareholder resolution at MUFG and a previous climate-related resolution at Mizuho that received 34.5% investor support.

Cite the original document

APA
admin (2021). Japanese banks still have to catch up with their European peers on coal. Reclaim Finance. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/06/23/japanese-banks-still-have-to-catch-up-with-their-european-peers-on-coal/
Chicago
admin. Japanese banks still have to catch up with their European peers on coal. Reclaim Finance, 2021. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/06/23/japanese-banks-still-have-to-catch-up-with-their-european-peers-on-coal/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=admin |title=Japanese banks still have to catch up with their European peers on coal |publisher=Reclaim Finance |date=23 June 2021 |url=https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/06/23/japanese-banks-still-have-to-catch-up-with-their-european-peers-on-coal/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{admin2021japanese, author = {admin}, title = {{Japanese banks still have to catch up with their European peers on coal}}, publisher = {Reclaim Finance}, year = {2021}, month = jun, url = {https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/06/23/japanese-banks-still-have-to-catch-up-with-their-european-peers-on-coal/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated