Understanding the Stay
Summary
The document argues that the Supreme Court's stay on the Clean Power Plan does not prohibit the EPA from continuing preparatory implementation work, nor does it automatically delay or 'toll' compliance deadlines.
Key insights
- The EPA is permitted to continue work on implementation matters, such as the Federal Plan and Model Trading Rules proposed in October, despite the Clean Power Plan's requirements being unenforceable during the stay.
- The Supreme Court's stay does not mandate the delaying or 'tolling' of compliance deadlines; any such adjustments would likely be determined by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit after the stay is lifted.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Walker, R. L. R. A. A. (2016). Understanding the Stay. Institute for Policy Integrity. https://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/understanding-the-stay
- Chicago
- Walker, Richard L. Revesz and Alexander. Understanding the Stay. Institute for Policy Integrity, 2016. https://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/understanding-the-stay.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Walker |first1=Richard L. Revesz and Alexander |title=Understanding the Stay |publisher=Institute for Policy Integrity |date=27 April 2016 |url=https://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/understanding-the-stay |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{walker2016understanding, author = {Walker, Richard L. Revesz and Alexander}, title = {{Understanding the Stay}}, institution = {Institute for Policy Integrity}, year = {2016}, month = apr, url = {https://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/understanding-the-stay}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated