Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on the Consideration of Downstream Costs in NEPA Analyses

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document advocates for a broad interpretation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), arguing that agencies must analyze indirect environmental impacts beyond proximate effects, specifically in the context of a Surface Transportation Board decision regarding a railway in Utah's Uinta Basin.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The D.C. Circuit ruled that the Surface Transportation Board's environmental review for a proposed oil railway in Utah's Uinta Basin was insufficient because it did not account for indirect effects, such as increased pollution and drilling in the Gulf Coast resulting from higher refinery operations and crude oil influx.
  • The Supreme Court is reviewing whether the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) mandates that agencies study environmental impacts that extend beyond the proximate effects of an action within the agency's regulatory authority.
  • The Institute for Policy Integrity contends that NEPA should be interpreted, consistent with established precedent, to compel agencies to evaluate effects that are reasonably foreseeable.

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Policy Integrity (n.d.). Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on the Consideration of Downstream Costs in NEPA Analyses. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/stb
Chicago
Institute for Policy Integrity. Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on the Consideration of Downstream Costs in NEPA Analyses. n.d. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/stb.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Institute for Policy Integrity |title=Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on the Consideration of Downstream Costs in NEPA Analyses |url=https://policyintegrity.org/projects/stb |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{instituteforpolicyintegrityndamicus, author = {{Institute for Policy Integrity}}, title = {{Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case on the Consideration of Downstream Costs in NEPA Analyses}}, institution = {Institute for Policy Integrity}, url = {https://policyintegrity.org/projects/stb}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated