Comments to OMB on Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Institute for Policy Integrity recommends that the EEA-C ITWG align environmental-economic accounting classifications with practical stakeholder use cases and increase transparency regarding data, code, and methods to encourage business adoption. Specific technical suggestions include expanding Forest accounts to distinguish between native and non-native forests and monoculture versus diverse plantations, adding plastic pollution to Water accounts, and incorporating measures of uncertainty to avoid misleading estimates.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Institute for Policy Integrity suggests that the EEA-C ITWG should determine how stakeholders, including businesses and statisticians, will utilize environmental-economic accounts to ensure the classifications are relevant and usable.
  • To increase confidence and adoption among businesses, the document recommends full transparency regarding the methods, assumptions, code, and data used in the classifications.
  • The document proposes specific expansions to accounting subcategories: Forest accounts should differentiate between native and non-native regenerating forests and between monoculture and diverse plantations, while Water accounts should include plastic pollution.
  • The Institute for Policy Integrity advises incorporating uncertainty measures into estimates to prevent misleading the public and to clarify data limitations.

Cite the original document

APA
Atal, J. A. S. P. H. R. (2025). Comments to OMB on Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications. Institute for Policy Integrity. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-omb-on-initial-guidance-for-environmental-economic-accounting-classifications
Chicago
Atal, Jason A Schwartz, Peter Howard, Raimundo. Comments to OMB on Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications. Institute for Policy Integrity, 2025. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-omb-on-initial-guidance-for-environmental-economic-accounting-classifications.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=Atal |first1=Jason A Schwartz, Peter Howard, Raimundo |title=Comments to OMB on Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications |publisher=Institute for Policy Integrity |date=18 February 2025 |url=https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-omb-on-initial-guidance-for-environmental-economic-accounting-classifications |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{atal2025comments, author = {Atal, Jason A Schwartz, Peter Howard, Raimundo}, title = {{Comments to OMB on Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications}}, publisher = {Institute for Policy Integrity}, year = {2025}, month = feb, url = {https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-omb-on-initial-guidance-for-environmental-economic-accounting-classifications}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated