comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Institute for Policy Integrity supports the EPA's November 2021 proposed standards for methane emissions in the oil and natural gas sector but urges the agency to expand the scope of regulated sources to include abandoned wells and flares. The organization further recommends enhancing the EPA's regulatory analysis through distributional analysis, extended time frames, and the quantification of co-benefits. Additionally, it advocates for a more robust justification of discount rates and the inclusion of global damages within the social cost of greenhouse gases (SC-GHG), asserting that the SC-GHG represents a lower bound of climate impacts.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Policy Integrity supports the EPA's proposed methane standards but suggests expanding the regulation to cover additional leaky sources, specifically flares and abandoned wells.
  • The organization recommends that the EPA improve its regulatory analysis by quantifying co-benefits, extending the analysis time frame, conducting a distributional analysis of impacts, and disaggregating costs and benefits.
  • Policy Integrity and a coalition of environmental groups recommend that the EPA expand its justification for discount rates and the inclusion of global damages in the social cost of greenhouse gases (SC-GHG), stating the SC-GHG is a lower bound of projected impacts.

Cite the original document

APA
Sarinsky, J. L. M. (2022). comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards. Institute for Policy Integrity. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards
Chicago
Sarinsky, Jack Lienke, Max. comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards. Institute for Policy Integrity, 2022. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=Sarinsky |first1=Jack Lienke, Max |title=comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards |publisher=Institute for Policy Integrity |date=31 January 2022 |url=https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{sarinsky2022commentstoepaonoilandgassectormethanestandards, author = {Sarinsky, Jack Lienke, Max}, title = {{comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards}}, publisher = {Institute for Policy Integrity}, year = {2022}, month = jan, url = {https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/comments-to-epa-on-oil-and-gas-sector-methane-standards}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated