Policy Integrity Files Brief in Case Challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Institute for Policy Integrity defends the EPA's 2016 supplemental finding on the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), asserting that the agency correctly considered regulatory costs and benefits, including indirect and unquantified benefits, in accordance with legal and economic standards.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The EPA's Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) indicated that the annual monetized benefits of regulating power plant emissions could exceed the costs by a ratio of nine to one.
  • The Institute for Policy Integrity contends that the EPA's inclusion of unquantified benefits and indirect benefits (also known as co-benefits or ancillary benefits) in its analysis aligns with federal cost-benefit guidelines, economic best practices, regulatory precedent, past court decisions, and the Clean Air Act.

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Policy Integrity (2017). Policy Integrity Files Brief in Case Challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/epas-mats-brief
Chicago
Institute for Policy Integrity. Policy Integrity Files Brief in Case Challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. 2017. https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/epas-mats-brief.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Institute for Policy Integrity |title=Policy Integrity Files Brief in Case Challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards |date=25 January 2017 |url=https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/epas-mats-brief |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{instituteforpolicyintegrity2017policy, author = {{Institute for Policy Integrity}}, title = {{Policy Integrity Files Brief in Case Challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards}}, institution = {Institute for Policy Integrity}, year = {2017}, month = jan, url = {https://policyintegrity.org/projects/update/epas-mats-brief}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated