Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022 finds that most of the 25 major global companies assessed have net-zero pledges that lack integrity, with aggregate emissions targeted for reduction by only 40% at most. While 15 companies report interim targets for 2030, the average reduction commitment for full value chain emissions is only 23%. Scope 3 emissions average 87% of total emissions, yet only 8 companies provide moderate detail on addressing them. The report notes a heavy reliance on unbundled renewable energy certificates (RECs) and contentious offsetting plans, particularly nature-based solutions, while suggesting that 'climate contributions' without neutrality claims are an emerging alternative.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The net-zero targets of the 25 assessed companies aim to reduce aggregate emissions by a maximum of 40%, rather than the 100% implied by the term 'net-zero'. Only three companies—Maersk, Vodafone, and Deutsche Telekom—commit to decarbonising over 90% of their full value chain emissions.
  • Interim 2030 targets are insufficient to align with Paris Agreement goals, with the average emission reduction commitment for full value chain emissions between 2019 and 2030 being only 23%.
  • Scope 3 emissions represent an average of 87% of the total emissions for the assessed companies, but only 8 of the 25 companies provide a moderate level of detail regarding plans to address these emissions.
  • Renewable electricity procurement integrity is generally low, as most companies rely on unbundled renewable energy certificates (RECs). However, 6 of the 25 companies use higher quality power purchase agreements (PPAs) and own-generation for the majority of their electricity.
  • Offsetting strategies are widespread and contentious; 19 of 25 companies intend to rely on offsetting, with at least two-thirds using nature-based solutions such as forestry, which the report deems unsuitable for individual offsetting claims due to the risk of reversal.

Cite the original document

APA
NewClimate Institute (2022). Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/corporate-climate-responsibility-monitor-2022
Chicago
NewClimate Institute. Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022. 2022. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/corporate-climate-responsibility-monitor-2022.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=NewClimate Institute |title=Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022 |date=7 February 2022 |url=http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/corporate-climate-responsibility-monitor-2022 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{newclimateinstitute2022corporate, author = {{NewClimate Institute}}, title = {{Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022}}, institution = {NewClimate Institute}, year = {2022}, month = feb, url = {http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/corporate-climate-responsibility-monitor-2022}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated