AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Summary
This report analyzes the legal, institutional, and legislative frameworks governing Indigenous peoples' conserved territories and areas conserved by Indigenous peoples and local communities (ICCAs) in Australia. It details the pathways to Indigenous land ownership, the mechanisms for joint management of national parks, and the emergence of Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs). The document examines the intersection of national laws—such as the Native Title Act 1993—with international human rights standards and provides case studies on specific conservation models.
Key insights
- Indigenous people in Australia obtain land ownership through three distinct legal pathways: statutory grants from governments following successful land rights claims, the recognition of native title (pre-colonial customary title) under the federal Native Title Act, and the direct purchase of land using government or other funds. Consequently, approximately 20% of the Australian land mass is under some form of Indigenous ownership and management, primarily in remote northern and central regions.
- Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) are voluntarily declared protected areas managed by Indigenous people. They are recognized as part of the National Reserve System (NRS) and contribute approximately 36.5 million hectares to the total terrestrial protected area estate of 106 million hectares. While initially limited to Indigenous-owned land, newer models like the Mandingalbay Yidinji IPA are 'Country-based,' meaning they are dedicated over multiple tenures, including existing government-declared parks and reserves.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Smyth, D., & Jaireth, H. (2012). AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES. Natural Justice. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Pacific-regional-Australia.pdf
- Chicago
- Smyth, Dermot, and Hannah Jaireth. AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES. Natural Justice, 2012. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Pacific-regional-Australia.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Smyth |first1=Dermot |last2=Jaireth |first2=Hannah |title=AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES |publisher=Natural Justice |date=September 2012 |url=https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Pacific-regional-Australia.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{smyth2012analysis, author = {Smyth, Dermot and Jaireth, Hannah}, title = {{AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES}}, institution = {Natural Justice}, year = {2012}, month = sep, url = {https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Pacific-regional-Australia.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated